Fox News Wannabes Will Act Like Sluts. Men, Stop Acting Like Pigs!
Eric Bolling has been suspended at Fox News amidst accusations of sexual harassment and it’s not hard to look back and understand why it’s within the realm of possibility.
If you’ve spent any time at a major conservative event (especially if Fox News is in attendance) you’ll see what could be considered a hooker convention. That’s not to say that there aren’t women who are dressed and act professionally, but for the most part women look like they’re for sale and if you spend any time watching Fox News, this is clearly an audition. Women bleach their hair blonde because that’s what the higher ups must believe their viewers want to see.
But that’s also where we have women who’ve appeared to stalk male on-air personalities and engage with them sexually in order to gain some kind of leverage for employment within the channel. Granted, this isn’t exclusive to FNC and it’s always insightful to see any media dirt exposed as they love to destroy the reputations of those THEY deem worthy and cringe at the thought they be held accountable for any past indiscretions.
BTW — It appears the woman behind numerous allegations at FNC is Caroline Heldman who was one of the main participants in the so-called documentary “The Hunting Ground”, that pushed the fake “1 in 5” statistic of rape on college campuses and is also making good use of her exposure with the Cosby accusers.
Heldman has been a frequent guest on Fox News over the years, despite the horrible treatment she now says she’s had to endure.
Whether we’re talking Bill O’Reilly, Charles Payne, an attempt at Sean Hannity, a Shep Smith politically correct cover-up, and now Bolling, Fox News’ men are being targeted and there’s one easy remedy to it all. Keep the ego in check and go to work to do the job, period. Meanwhile, Fox News should not assume their audience is a bunch of country music-loving men with hard-ons for bubble-headed millennial blondes (real or not) and stop putting them on the air. No matter what they deem they have to do to get there.
Stop Repeating Trans-misinformation
More than fifty United States Senators have participated in performance art in sending a letter of protest to the Secretary of Defense regarding the president’s announcement that transgenders will no longer be allowed to serve in the military. Almost everyone on the left is uniformly referring to this 2014 Rand study that claims that “gender transitioning” costs will only be between “$2.4 million and $8.4 million” annually. However, there’s another set of figures out there being ignored altogether and for good reason.
There are 178,000 new military members per year, and assuming 0.7 percent are transgender, 1,246 new transgender service members each year. Assuming 30 percent get surgeries, there would be an additional 374 surgical transitions per year, or 3,740 over 10 years. Those surgeries would cost $493 million, and with 3 percent inflation a total of $579 million by 2027. The costs of active duty transgender surgeries and those of new recruits over a 10-year period total $1.349 billion.
It is likely even more transgender service members would seek sex reassignment surgeries if they are taxpayer-funded.
— Washington Free Beacon, 7/27/17
You have to admit, there IS a huge difference between “$2.4 million to $8.4 million” and close to $135 million annually for transgender health care services and only a fool would exempt transgenders from having ulterior motives in volunteering for military service where gender “reassignment” surgeries would keep them off any meaningful duty for a good portion of their enlistment period.
Serving in the military is not a right. People are rejected for a variety of reasons, physical and mental. A gender change-of-mind isn’t a valid exception.
Quote of the Week
It’s sad that Capitol Hill Republicans are so impotent that they’ll not be able to take advantage of a gift that keeps giving.
I want you to know, if it was not for the love and respect shown to me by black women, those right-wing ultra conservatives … they would have me believe I’m too black, I’m too confrontational, I’m too tough, and I’m too disrespectful of them. But now I know I’m simply a strong, black woman.
I don’t care how big you are, I don’t care how high you are, if you come for me, I’m coming for you!
— Rep. Maxine Waters, 2017 Black Girls Rock Awards, 8/5/17
Waters hangs among the friendlies, kicks dissenters out of her constituents’ town hall meetings and plays the race card believing that’s the only shield she has as insulation from the fact she’s only on Capitol Hill because of black voters who only vote for her because she’s black; not because of what she’s failed to deliver to her district since 1991 in Congress and before since 1977 in the California assembly.
The Left Now Seeks to Choose the 2020 Republican Candidate
One thing’s always been a constant; when the left and their media tells the public which Republican they believe can beat a Democrat, they’re really telling us who they prefer that Democrat face for a more assured victory.
Senators Tom Cotton and Ben Sasse have already been to Iowa this year, Gov. John Kasich is eyeing a return visit to New Hampshire, and Mike Pence’s schedule is so full of political events that Republicans joke that he is acting more like a second-term vice president hoping to clear the field than a No. 2 sworn in a little over six months ago. President Trump’s first term is ostensibly just warming up, but luminaries in his own party have begun what amounts to a shadow campaign for 2020 — as if the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue weren’t involved.
The would-be candidates are cultivating some of the party’s most prominent donors, courting conservative interest groups and carefully enhancing their profiles. Mr. Trump has given no indication that he will decline to seek a second term.
— New York Times, 8/5/17
The left never expected Donald Trump to last two weeks after he announced his presidential run, let alone win. He’s failed to do what every Republican candidate is expected to do: lay down when told to do so. He’s offered and implemented policies that horrify Democrats and their base and has declined to offer any “bipartisan” watered down olive branches, so it’s no wonder the Times and the left are hoping out-of-touch, sore loser Republican donors will ignore Trump supporters and push for a more controllable candidate; a candidate who’ll be eviscerated and softened up by the media long before the Democrat candidate creates one opposition ad.
Hillary Still Can’t Let it Go
It takes a certain brand of ego to want to be the leader of the free world. Motives should be what a person can do for the country; not what the country can do for the person. It appears Hillary Clinton, while laying kinda low, still needs to be adored and in charge of something… anything.
Hillary Clinton has hired Emmy Ruiz and Adam Parkhomenko from her 2008 and 2016 presidential campaigns to help manage Onward Together, the project she founded this spring with former governor Howard Dean to fund and support a coalition of Democratic groups led by activists and organizers.
Clinton’s new group, registered in May as a 501c4 organization with an affiliated super PAC, is working to establish a small but diverse cooperative of about 10 to 12 grassroots efforts, each one focused on a different area of the energy and activism set off by Donald Trump’s election and presidency. Dean said they are still in the process vetting groups to add to the coalition, which already includes organizations such as Swing Left, Emerge America, and Run For Something.
— BuzzFeed, 8/4/17
Spending other people’s money is what Democrats do best, regardless of the return on investment (or lack thereof).