The COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines and boosters could be one vehicle to rid the world of the unwashed and the elites openly admit as much.

Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders class of 2021 include the Lieutenant Governor, State of Michigan, a Senior Vice-President at Uber, racist activist Ibram X Kendi and executives at Dow, Pfizer and Merck among many others. This class join radical left luminaries such as Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Peter Buttigieg, Emmanuel Macron, Gavin Newsom, Angela Merkel, Jacinda Ardern and many others. According to their website, the Young Global Leaders consist of “more than 1,400 members and alumni of 120 nationalities”. The individuals are trained to be “Aligned with the World Economic Forum’s mission,” to “drive public-private co-operation in the global public interest.”
— RAIR Foundation, 12/26/21

Note the near-daily onslaught of new vaccine mandates and demonization of those not willing to obey. In the United States alone, the urgency is reflected in messaging directly from President Biden, federal unelected health officials, cable television anchors and pundits, and anonymous bullies on social media. The unvaccinated are being insulted with the desired expectation that they will succumb and take the jab.

But after months, it’s not working and the desperation of the elites is showing with the addition of more unconstitutional mandates and in some countries, we see fines and even quarantine camps for the unvaccinated. There is a impetus to isolate and remove all those who won’t fall for the coronavirus fear porn; those who dare openly defy orders while sharing unsanctioned studies and statistics of the silent carnage the paid, propagandists in the media refuse to report and dare not admit.

So the question must be asked, why are the elites so worried about the unvaccinated?

In the not-too-distant future, it could be pretty evident what the pandemic version of the Great Reset has resulted in and there will be a lot of really pissed off people; much more than those who frequent the World Economic Forum and Aspen Institute are prepared to deal with.

It could get real ugly….

Now I’m not saying he should have killed her… but I understand.
— Chris Rock — Bring The Pain (1996)

Under normal circumstances, no law-abiding person advocates for violence, but if Planet Earth is suddenly millions of people less because some not-necessarily-the-best-and-brightest, mostly wealthy old white and/or compliant liberals believe they’re better off without those deemed beneath them, the survivors could make things very uncomfortable for the special and deservedly so.

Despite having all the money at their disposal, they won’t be able to enjoy it simply because of numbers.

There will be hundreds in any given location who will be ready to heap payback on those who won’t be able to bask as freely as they have before. There won’t be a vacation home too remote and/or secure. There won’t be a mega-yacht that can anchor far enough off coast with the inevitability that they will have to come ashore at some point to replenish. There won’t be an exclusive resort too private. There won’t be property lines large enough to give a sense of sanctuary to those who cavalierly believe they can dictate who should be allowed to live and those who must not so the special can “reimagine” society as they see fit while they continue to live a life of over-the-top luxury.

And what should be done to these vile people once detained? Preferably a prison cell in a very remote, desolate place where they’ll remain for the rest of their entitled lives. A lot of alone time to reflect on their arrogance and possible culpability in the slaughter of millions of people they believed inferior and not worthy of living.

An international group of physicians and scientists signed a declaration Friday accusing COVID-19 policy-makers of “crimes against humanity” for preventing the use of life saving treatments on their patients. The Physicians Declaration had garnered more than 4,600 signatures. The signers accused policymakers of forcing a “one-size-fits-all” treatment strategy, resulting in “needless illness and death,” rather than “upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized.”
—– Children’s Health Defense, 9/27/21

The Hunt 2 The Great Reset will probably never be made into a major motion picture.

It may not need to be.

Covid-19 vaccine maker Moderna designed its vaccine against the novel coronavirus in just two days. On Jan. 11, Chinese authorities shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus, according to Moderna’s website. Two days later, on Jan. 13, the National Institutes of Health and Moderna’s infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for mRNA-1273, the formal name of the company’s Covid-19 vaccine. The company then went on to formulate a clinical batch, according to a company spokesperson.

Moderna announced it intends to apply today to the US Food and Drug Administration for authorization of its Covid-19 vaccine.
— CNN, 11/30/20

TWO DAYS.

It brings to mind an iconic opening scene from a rather bad remake.

Not only does one have to absorb the reality that so many want to put something into their body that took TWO DAYS to create, but there obviously hasn’t been time to study what the side effects will be.

Clinical trials move through phases, testing interventions in larger groups until they are determined safe and effective.

The first three phases can take several years to complete and aside from those hurried, an important phase appears to have been blown off altogether.

Phase 4: This phase is often called “Post-Approval Research and Monitoring.” After a new treatment is approved by the FDA, the pharmaceutical or device company may want to continue monitoring patients to learn more about the treatment’s longer-term effects, while comparing it against other already-approved options. It may take time for long-term side effects to appear, making this an important phase.
— Antidote

And you know there will be side effects because there always are.

So, this is just something to ponder.

Approximately one year ago, no one thought the world and her economies would be taken down by an invisible virus, not to mention the political fallout. Let’s be real: NO ONE knows what the short or long-term side effects of a COVID-19 vaccine will be and despite the assurances against the unknowns, there will be geniuses on Capitol Hill and state houses around the country that will propose the taking of the said vaccines be made mandatory. You’d think such decisions would require more care and deliberation.

Then again, how much more damage can be caused because of a couple of days?

Bill Gates jumped-started Moderna and his vaccine track record has been scandalous, to say the least.

Anyone defending the Bill Gates/WHO global vaccine program needs to explain this study: Mogensen et al 2017. Prior to 2017, neither HHS nor WHO ever performed the kind of vaccinated/unvaccinated (or placebo) study necessary to ascertain if the DTP vaccine actually yields beneficial health outcomes. The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the US and western nations in the 1990s following thousands of reports of death and brain damage.

Bill Gates and his surrogates, GAVI and WHO, made DTP a priority for African babies. The Danish government and Novo Nordisk Foundation commissioned this study by a team of the world’s leading experts on African vaccination. The two most prominent names, Drs. Soren Mogensen and Peter Aaby, are both vocal vaccine supporters. They were shocked when they examined years of data from a so called “natural experiment” in Guinea Bissau where 50% of children die before age five. In that west African nation, half the children were vaccinated with the DTP vaccine at three months and the other half at six months. Dr. Mogenson and his team found that girls vaccinated with the DTP vaccine died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated kids. While the vaccinated children were protected from Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis, they were far more susceptible to other deadly diseases than unvaccinated peers. The vaccine apparently compromised their immune systems. Thanks to Gates, DTP is the world’s most popular vaccine.
— Children’s Health Defense, 4/23/20

We’ve been hearing so much about how COVID-19 has disproportionately affected the black community and the left wants blacks and Latinos to get the first batch of vaccines available.

I guess we’ll find out what the side effects are soon enough.

UPDATE

Maybe not, but at least the probability is belatedly being discussed.

In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”

For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.
— Children’s Health Defense, 2/9/21

Remember this before you race out to get vaccine shots.

Severe heat in the United States, torrential rains and flooding in the Far East, tornados in the midwest, and it’s all being blamed on man made “climate change” and for once, we agree. But it’s not solely because of the effect of industrialization but because arrogant climate scientists believe they alone can play God, tweak the weather, play havoc with our health and just look the other way after the literal fallout.

Some of the very climate catastrophes they predict now appear to be of THEIR making and they didn’t even have the common courtesy of asking the American people first before they interfered.

David Keith, who manages a multimillion dollar geoengineering research fund provided by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, previously commissioned a study by a US aerospace company that made the case for the feasibility of large-scale deployment of solar geoengineering technologies.
— The Guardian, 7/17/12

We’ve heard these scientists speak of their desire to lower the temperature but does anyone really know what the “normal” temperature for the planet should be or are we just talking about what’s comfortable for humans, which is suggestive as climates differ with location and people have adapted accordingly for centuries. That is, until agenda-driven, taxpayer-funded government-granted scientists decided they should put chemicals in the sky without even the courtesy of asking the American public first, because what’s deposited into the atmosphere doesn’t hover indefinitely; it eventually falls on all of us.

Of course, all involved ignore the health ramifications on the public because we were mandated to have health insurance that benefits who…? And how many times have we seen science fiction stories where arrogant, overambitious scientists created a bigger problem putting the public in the crosshairs, and then shake their heads in belated remorse after the cataclysmic damage was done.

To counteract global warming, humans may someday consider spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to form clouds — and artificially cool the Earth. However, suddenly stopping that spraying would have a “devastating” global impact on animals and plants, potentially even leading to extinction, according to the first study on the potential biological impacts of climate intervention.
— USA Today, 1/22/18

Great, they conveniently won’t turn off what they took it upon themselves to start. This should keep those all-important, multimillion dollar taxpayer-funded grants coming in regardless of the ramifications to the unconsulted public!

A White House road map for federally funded climate research has for the first time recommended research into geoengineering, the concept of intervening in nature to slow or reverse global warming.

The document, an update of a report that lays out a plan for climate-related research at 13 federal agencies until 2021, calls for studies related to the two most-discussed approaches to geoengineering: distributing chemicals in the atmosphere to reflect more heat-producing sunlight away from the earth, and removing carbon dioxide from the air so the atmosphere traps less heat.

Opponents of the idea, including many scientists, argue the risks are too great: Geoengineering might have unintended damaging effects on weather patterns, or it might be used unilaterally as a weapon by governments or even extremely wealthy individuals.
— New York Times, 1/10/17

Note how they’re calling for the “recommended research in geoengineering” they’ve been doing for many years now. How deceitful is that!

So when you see that fine haze in what should have been a crisp, blue sky (deposited without our knowledge or consent), know that it will eventually come down on all of us; either in the form of erratic weather events and/or toxic chemical “side effects” no American citizen gave them authorization to dump on us in the first place.