With a midterm destruction looming, the Democrat National Committee brought out big gun Vice President Kamala Harris to explain just who’s really to blame for all things gone wrong since Biden’s inauguration: the American people.

People don’t like being blamed for things they didn’t do, or in this case, want. At the same time, there are those who wanted certain agenda items implemented but were too arrogant and/or stupid to know how predictably bad their desires would turn out.

These are the people Kamala Harris publicly blame for everything Biden wanted that, anyone with a functioning brain knew, would go horribly wrong.

Is Vice President Harris openly admitting she knew the Biden agenda was going to be really bad but the administration implemented destructive policies just because they wished to respect the Will of the People? It wouldn’t be a first time for Democrats.

One would think….

DNC Chair Jaime Harrison clearly had a bad night, while Kamala Harris and Joe Biden were Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.

One can clearly see why Democrats need the media and Big Tech to win elections.

When left to their own devices, they are quite the fuck-ups.

Special counsel John Durham told a federal court that he is scrutinizing members of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign as part of his criminal inquiry into the origins and conduct of the Trump-Russia investigation.
— Washington Examiner, 12/20/21

Oh… shit.

If Hillary was in any kind of personal legal jeopardy, what card would she play? Turns out she’s been down that road before and it all worked out in the end.

FBI clears Clinton – again
In Michigan, Donald Trump called Clinton “the most corrupt person ever to seek the office of the presidency of the United States.” But the Republican nominee, who has expressed hope in the last week that the FBI’s review of new emails might yield an indictment, emphasized to his supporters Sunday that Clinton is “protected” by powerful forces.

“Well, you have to understand it’s a rigged system and she’s protected,” Trump said in Minnesota.
— CNN, 11/6/16

While the narrative will be any mention of criminality regarding Clinton is verboten, she will be justifiably and mercilessly pummeled by Donald Trump (IF he decides to run again) over the whole Steele dossier-Russia-collusion hoax and while the pro-Democrat media will shrug it off as old news, dismiss it as censor-worthy “conspiracy theory” or conveniently forget it ever happened, John Durham will not and he may start handing Hillary bad news soon enough.

So, what would be the only shield she has available to keep a very newsworthy prosecution at bay?

A run for President of the United States where any legal move against her will (again) be called a partisan ploy to deny the will of Democrat voters. It worked in 2016 so why not play that card when she needs it again against someone who could care less about the squealing of CNN, MSNBC, and New York Times bodyguards?

Let’s not forget Hillary doesn’t need the drama. Aside from a bruised ego that STILL refuses to let go of her being robbed in 2016, she’s living a relatively good life. She has stay-at-home book and podcast deals, and an assortment of potential media projects at the drop of a phone call to the 818 area code. She can drink all the Chardonnay she wants and no one sees her fall over. She knows and dreads all the personal intrusions another run for president would bring. She also knows an indifferent, politically unfettered John Durham could put a serious crimp in her financials, if not her freedom.

Hillary is Durham’s ultimate target and she knows it. “Opposition research” coordinated between her campaign and the DNC, culminating in the elaborate Russia fabrication that resulted in millions in investigations, improper warrants, targeted “process crime” prosecutions, and the smearing of a United States president still to this day, would have only been green-lighted by the candidate. Hillary Clinton was solely responsible for the deployment of that Big Lie.

So while the pundit class boisterously speculate as to the motives of yet another Hillary run for the presidency, here’s something else to consider.

If you search for any video of Senator Kamala Harris’ vice presidential nomination acceptance speech, there’s much you won’t see. Almost every news organization has edited off the footage after Harris ends her speech and the reason is obvious: the Democratic National Committee got busted.

Harris walks over to a virtual wall of ecstatic supporters, all giddy and clapping. She waves back.

The sheer number of faces implies there are so many enthusiastic women. But there’s one slight problem.

There are not as many people online as suggested.

As you can see, some of the women in the Zoom loop are repeats.

And it wasn’t a one time faux pas….

The media has edited out the reaction to Harris’ speech because it’s just another example of the amateurish, incompetent, arrogant pre-production of the 2020 DNC Convention OR their contempt for the intelligence of the Democrat Party and American people.

It’s not clear if the women in the feed are live or this is a video being replayed on cue, but with the millions of dollars the DNC had at their disposal, little things like this could have been avoided, especially will all the supporters the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris ticket supposedly has.

Or do they…?

Should Donald Trump be removed from office, that would make Mike Pence the president while there’s a scenario where Nancy Pelosi could become vice president (pending nomination and confirmation); a horrifying scenario to be sure. As vice president, Pelosi would continue her bully tactics and use her leverage with a Democrat-controlled House to create and/or shut down current policy items. One such federal activity she could definitely target for immediate termination, and Democrats have every reason to do so, would be the Durham investigation.

In October, it was reported that John Durham, U.S. attorney from Connecticut was expanding the scope of his investigation, adding agents and resources, to examine the post-election timeline up to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel in May 2017.

Hmm, no leaks….

The “investigation into the investigators” was reported to be upgraded to a criminal inquiry later that month, which gives Durham the power to impanel a grand jury and hand down indictments.
— Washington Examiner, 1/27/20

“Grand jury and serve indictments” and the expanded “investigation into the investigators” is undoubtedly what has many in and around Capitol Hill very nervous as while it was very cool to have those within President Trump’s circle investigated, incur exorbitant attorney fees resulting in harsh financial hardship (and in some cases imprisonment), the very thought of the same happening to them is something that must keep many up at night given their possible involvement in what can only be called that “soft coup d’état”.

It’s not clear how many of those involved (that we currently know of) would be willing to fall on a sword for an immediate superior but do you really think Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, James Comey, John Brennan, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok and others would be willing to rely on GoFundMe solicitations to pay for high-priced lawyers, especially when (in this case) a grand jury decision can speed up the normal process and bring a defendant straight into a federal courtroom facing hostile DOJ lawyers?

Mark Zaid, the attorney representing the Ukraine whistleblower, boasted in two recently discovered tweets of ongoing efforts to stage a coup to remove Mr. Trump: “coup has started. First of many steps. rebellion. impeachment will follow,” Mr. Zaid tweeted in January 2017. Later the same month, he tweeted: “coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place.”
— Washington Times, 11/20/19

What the Democrats know is that the Durham investigation findings are not just another federally-produced white paper with “suggestions” that can be amplified or blown off at the discretion of the affected agencies and/or the media. High profile defendants could be frog-matched in front of international cameras and a detailed list of their possible activities would be made public for all to see and digest. Then it would be up to those defendants to absorb the cost of their defense and have to decide how far in a trial they’d want to go, OR maybe plea bargain in exchange for ratting out someone above who knew about or even ordered them to commit crimes that may include treason.

No sooner had Mr. Trump been elected than Rosa Brooks, a former Defense Department official during the Obama administration, wrote an essay for Foreign Policy magazine discussing theoretical ways to remove Mr. Trump before the 2020 election, among them a scenario involving a military coup.

Think about how many people it would take to pull that off.

In September 2018, The New York Times published an op-ed from an anonymous White House official who boasted of supposedly widescale efforts inside the Trump administration to nullify its operations and subvert presidential directives.

“Inside”….

Mr. Trump’s opponents often have praised the deep state precisely because unelected career officials are seen as the most effective way to sabotage and stymie his agenda.

So while we’re all being told that President Trump committed impeachable offenses and deserves to be removed from office months before the next election because Democrats know they can’t beat him, think about what they’re NOT talking about and probably truly fear.

A Durham report coming out before the election could have a profound effect with dire ramifications for not only those accused, but those whose fingerprints verify involvement including Fusion GPS, the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton and her campaign, those within the Obama administration and maybe even former president Barack Obama himself.

The thought of a President Donald Trump, unfettered by the yoke of reelection, taking it to the very agencies, personnel and politicians who decided THEY were going to undo the 2016 and 2020 will of the people is a scary prospect indeed because Trump will show no mercy and will carry a very big book to throw at them.

And they all know it.

A class action lawsuit alleging the Democratic National Committee worked in conjunction with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign to keep Bernie Sanders out of the White House has been raging on in the courtrooms for months on end–and yet, most people have no idea of its existence, in large part thanks to the mainstream media’s total lack of coverage.

Jared Beck, a Harvard Law graduate and one of the several attorneys who filed the suit against the DNC and its former chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz, wants retribution for donations made by supporters to the Vermont senator’s campaign, citing six legal claims of the DNC’s deceptive conduct, negligent misrepresentation and fraud. The DNC violated Article 5, Section 4 of its own charter by working with a single campaign to effectively choose who would win the Democratic ballot, the attorneys stated in the suit.
— Newsweek, 5/17/17

Many of us who’ve been following politics long before Bernie got into the race know that Hillary Clinton has always been a weak candidate who almost always needs the road to be plowed for her by those who’ll willingly assist.

In a letter sent Monday, Bernie Sanders supporters are demanding that attorneys from Perkins Coie LLP be removed from the case due to a conflict of interest. New emails discovered through the WikiLeaks dump show that attorneys from the law firm have given strategy advice to hurt Sanders, well before he dropped out. To add fuel to their claim, they’ve now discovered that attorneys from Perkins Coie are representing both the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign.
— LawNewz, 7/26/16

Donald Trump did not win the presidential election because of Russian meddling and/or collusion with his campaign. Donald Trump won because Republicans, who initially supported any of the other 16 candidates, for the most part voted for the party nominee on election day. Very, very few crossed over to vote for the Democrat.

The lawyer who filed a class-action lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee and its ex-chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz nearly a year ago tells RT that there has been a “mainstream media blackout” of the fraud case stemming from the 2016 primary.

Jared Beck, the attorney leading the lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, went on RT’s “Redacted Tonight” to tell host Lee Camp that while the media covered “every moment” of the trials against OJ Simpson, Casey Anthony and George Zimmerman, the coverage of the DNC lawsuit has been a “total blackout.”
— Russia Today, 5/19/17

BTW — Did CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, the New York Times and/or Washington Post report about the death of a participant in the lawsuit against the DNC…?

No, and the DNC has other legal issues receiving scant media attention.

On May 12, CBS reported another class action lawsuit was filed against the DNC for stiffing dozens of field organizers all over the country for overtime work during the 2016 election while the DNC gave out $1 million in bonuses, including more than $300,000 to Democratic National Convention Host Committee Executive Director Kevin Washo. The lawsuit was filed by Justin Swidler of Cherry Hill, N.J. on behalf of 40 to 50 field organizers against the DNC, Pennsylvania state Democrats, and five other state Democratic Parties.
— Observer, 5/15/17

So, Bernie supporters shouldn’t feel singled out. The DNC seems to have a pattern of screwing many in favor of the few.

But one DNC lawyer’s argument actually tries to justify the party’s right to be biased on behalf of one primary candidate over another, according to an article from The Young Turks. In other words, they could have chosen their nominee over cigars in a backroom. That’s what the attorney reportedly said in a Florida federal court.
— LawNewz, 4/29/17

Most Bernie supporters voted the party line. However, many Sanders supporters who felt screwed over by the DNC, either didn’t vote or voted for Trump. The mistrust within the ranks didn’t end after Hillary “won” the Democrat Party presidential nomination. It’s still festering to this day and it’s clear there’s much more substance to the DNC’s interference in the election process in favor of Clinton than anything the media can pin on the Russians against.

A class action lawsuit could prove millions of supporters of an embattled progressive campaign right, or further support President Donald Trump’s notion that the 2016 election was, in fact, rigged.

The whining media has succeeded, so far, in making it all-about-Russia and giving the easily-led something easy to recite. But when there is a resolution, we’ll not only see proof that Hillary’s campaign DID collude with the DNC and the media that continues to use their positions to steer the public in the direction THEY want.

If anyone “undermined our democracy”, it wasn’t Donald Trump or his campaign. It was the Democrat Party, their friendly media, and until all receive the attention and scorn deserved, it will happen again.

Doesn’t it always?

The understandable response from the right, politically, is Ms. Brown is the PERFECT person to lead (from behind) the Democrat National Committee because her approach would surely do irrefutable infrastructure damage to the party.

Here’s the problem.

While there ARE politics involved, Boynton Brown clearly illustrates why blacks in America continue to languish educationally and economically behind the rest of the American population, especially while the Democrat Party enjoys their unwavering vote.

On many illustrative instances, Boynton Brown referred to black people as “they” and “them”, something her hypersensitive self should of been conscious of but that’s how liberals look down as blacks as. Giving legitimacy to loud-mouth bullies like #BlackLivesMatter shows how clueless is as demands for increased funding for college “black studies” departments won’t do shit for blacks aside from producing a select few candidates for liberal nonprofits that can’t allow the success of any mission.

For decades, Democrats have expected so little of blacks, they’ve embraced the very policies that exacerbate their bigotry of low expectations. There are probably no “midnight basketball” programs in Boynton Brown’s white neighborhood because young whites are not expected to be out on the streets after 1am doing God-knows-what.

There are probably fewer young white males in Boynton Brown’s white neighborhood running afoul of the law because young white males are not expected to be out on the streets after 1am doing God-knows-what. It’s also probably easier for young white people to find gainful employment in Boynton Brown’s neighborhood because their stereotypical depiction is not based on a negative reality.

Hopefully a DNC chair Boynton Brown could “listen” to blacks that were selectively herded into housing projects that were almost exclusively constructed in black neighborhoods, the black family that’s been strategically destroyed by liberal Democrat policies.

Freakonomics 2005: Abortion and crime: who should you believe?

Just whose neighborhoods would this be addressing?

The Democrat Party, under the standard set by liberal icon Margaret Sanger, has been doing their part to fight crime in the inner city by providing as many disproportionate opportunities to abort black babies while distributing as many dollars to Planned Parenthood and NARAL as possible.

There are many issues (perpetual failing schools with irresponsible teachers who’ll toss their children on the street at the slightest opportunity to strike for higher salaries despite graduating students who can’t read, write or do basic math), that Sally Boynton Brown needs to “listen” to.

Then again, just what have Democrat “listening tours” ever accomplished?

Sally Boynton Brown being the chair of the DNC would be a target-rich opportunity for levity. Unfortunately, lives are not a joke.

Even for “them”.

But it appears the Democrat Party believes their base is so stupid, they have to provide them with “talking points” for the Thanksgiving dinner table as to rebut any ugly right-wing propaganda that might pollute an otherwise perfectly liberal holiday get together.

It’s that time of year — full of food and fun and celebrating with family and friends. But we here at the DNC know that occasionally all that togetherness can lead to some… let’s call them “lively” conversations about politics with that one Republican uncle (or aunt, or brother — you know who I’m talking about). And as Democrats, it’s up to each of us to go into those situations ready with the truth.

So I’m officially deputizing you to serve as a Deputy Democratic Spokesperson this holiday season — and giving you special access to all the facts you could ever want.

We’ve designed a handy website with the perfect responses to all the most common right-wing talking points spouted by your family members who may spend a little too much time tuned into factually-challenged conservative talk radio. Click here to check it out.

When it comes to the economy, health care, climate change, and immigration we know there are the facts, and then there’s what Republicans want to believe. But don’t blame your Republican relatives too much — after all, they’re only taking after the GOP’s presidential candidates and their loose interpretation of reality.

That’s why we have this handy guide compiled, so you can do your part to debunk the latest myths coming from the right wing bubble. Make sure you check it out before turkey-time:

www.YourRepublicanUncle.com

Thanks for doing your part! I’m so glad to have you on the team.

Have a great Thanksgiving!

Luis

Luis Miranda
Communications Director
Democratic National Committee

Note the liberal assumption that men are evil, thus it’s that intolerable “Republican Uncle” who’ll be the one to fuck up Thanksgiving.

The holiday season is filled with food, traveling, and lively discussions with Republican relatives about politics sometimes laced with statements that are just not true. Here are the most common myths spouted by your family members who spend too much time listening to Rush Limbaugh and the perfect response to each of them.

Translation: You’re most likely to be sandbagged by some obnoxious Republican in your family during a time when you just want to relax and enjoy that ambiance with loved ones. Sadly, you’ll be inundated with untruths and here are the crib note answers, seeing how you’d be flustered and caught off guard by the rude, homophobic, misogynistic, jingoistic, racist, right-wing lies.

As things are only believable to the left when they come from their certifiable sources….

New York Times: How to Talk to Your Relatives About Politics at Thanksgiving
Washington Post: How to talk to your family about politics this Thanksgiving
Think Progress: How To Talk To Your Tea Party Uncle About Obamacare This Thanksgiving
HuffPo 2013: Here’s Every Argument You’ll Need To Win Your Obamacare Debate This Thanksgiving
UCS 2014: How to Talk About Climate Change at Thanksgiving: Recipes for Good Conversations
Michael Bloomberg 2014: Everytown for Gun Safety Thanksgiving

And suggestions even came down from the White House.

As people sitting around the Thanksgiving table talking about these issues as they should and I’m sure they will all across the country, I hope that’s a question that will be raised and asked by members around the table.
— Josh Earnest, White House Press Secretary

Look, we’re talking family and it’s not like you can dis-invite them, then again try being a black Republican in a Democrat family where physical bans routinely occur.

But should your Democrat aunt or know-it-all, college student-mooch decide to pull a get-in-your-face around the dinner table, let them spout. Tell he or she what you didn’t have to memorize and when you get that familiar “There’s nothing more to talk about!”, you’ll find your Thanksgiving dinner will almost immediately become more enjoyable because your liberal relative has more than enough incentive to keep that mouth shut.

That is, until it’s time for more free food.