Many of us have been sitting uneasy while being consistently and gleefully taunted by the left of the legal “losses” by Trump campaign lawyers and cases brought to courts by Lin Wood and Sidney Powell. But good defense lawyers don’t always go for the win; they try to hang a jury with reasonable doubt.

Thanks to a media that depends on the ignorance of their consumers, it’s believed the Trump strategy is to flip states that voted for Joe Biden. That may not be the sole objective. Instead of going from blue to red, the goal may be to get the electors to not certify their state for any candidate. That would mean the Electoral College votes would not go to either candidate and in the case of states where Biden was declared the winner by the media*, his vote count would be reduced and as Fareed Zakaria reminded us in September, it would bring both candidates below the required 270 votes needed to outright win the presidency.

According to the Constitution, the House of Representatives settles the matter. Of course, the ignorant left would be reassured Biden would win because the Democrats control the House, but hold on.

That’s not how it works….

Instead of a full vote among House members, each state is awarded one vote and seeing how there are currently more Republican-controlled states than Democrat states, that vote will fall in President Trump’s favor and he would win a second term.

So, tolerate the minutia and collateral damage (on both sides) for the time being: the drama over voting machines and “spikes”, count irregularities, public hearings and pundit hand-wringing that we don’t just bend over and accept the election result they prefer. That’s all being compiled for the long-overdue Democrat coup d’état-deep state-swamp-fake news media reckoning.

For now, it’s all being accumulated to create reasonable doubt and give electors the cover required to do the Constitutional thing.

When the prophet Isaiah ben Amoz wrote Book of Isaiah, chapter 11, verse six…

The wolf shall dwell with the lamb,
and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat,
and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together;
and a little child shall lead them.
— Book of Isaiah, 11:6

… do you think he would’ve added a few caveats knowing a future society would produce a couple generations of arrogant, self-absorbed narcissists that would inevitably rise to a modicum of power and influence?

What if we could’ve used Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) as a hypothetical…?

It would’ve been an interesting conversation to have been had.

But as evidenced by their tactics starting with #BlackLivesMatter, disruption of the lives of the American people was a direct act of punishment. The election of President Trump inspired the Democrat-sanctioned Indivisible #resistance that sought to push back against a public official they didn’t vote for and punish the American people to this day. We see their punishment with the introduction of everything anti-Trump in our classrooms, cable news and media reporting, primetime television plotlines, late night so-called comedy shows, music and more.

Now that Democrats have some Capitol Hill power, they can start exacting their punishment against those who dared vote against them.

Democrats will take control of the U.S. House in January with big items topping their legislative to-do list: Remove obstacles to voting, close loopholes in government ethics law and reduce the influence of political money. Party leaders say the first legislative vote in the House will come on H.R. 1, a magnum opus of provisions that Democrats believe will strengthen U.S. democratic institutions and traditions.

The bill would establish automatic voter registration and reinvigorate the Voting Rights Act, crippled by a Supreme Court decision in 2013. It would take away redistricting power from state legislatures and give it to independent commissions.

Other provisions would overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, which declared political spending is First Amendment free speech; they would mandate more disclosure of outside money and establish a public financing match for small contributions.
— NPR, 11/12/18

We see how elections in the United States are now conducted.

When Democrats win by the end of Election Day, the results are a “will of the people” sanctioned and accepted done deal. When Republicans win, we must “count every vote” past Election Day until enough DEMOCRAT votes can be “found” and the Democrat wins. While the left will laugh at this, there are enough recent examples of only Democrats winning after losing to see there is funny business going on.

More insidious is the Democrat desire to enable more vehicles to make finding votes when needed by controlling the mechanisms: circumventing state control of their districting and reinterpreting what is free speech. When it comes to Hillary’s “Citizens United” hemorrhoid that’s never healed, Democrats argue that entities are not people and can’t advocate for-or-against candidates… however they’ll never touch the unions that to that very thing and more for them every election cycle, not make one video Hillary didn’t like.

Thankfully, H.R. 1 won’t make it past the Senate and if it did, would be vetoed by President Trump but it’s always nice to know what the other side’s true motivations are.

The only silver lining is salivating Democrats will overreach. They always do when they get a taste of that all-consuming power and their success today will be something they’ll be in hysterical panic-mode at undoing when it comes back to bite them.

And why so much emphasis on Hillary?

Because she’s always needed a path cleared to make things easier for her political aspirations. Creating more voters, Democrats controlling districts and dictating what can or cannot be said about her ever… now why would that be a Democrat priority with the next political cycle being the 2020 presidential election?