While there are now thousands of examples of the naivete of his statement, granted in 1981 Jobs’ main goal was to sell Apple products, here is one of the latest examples of Internet tools being misused (and excused) by a child and with deadly results.

18-year-old Obdulia Sanchez was shooting live video with her cell phone while driving near Merced, California. She was rolling when the car went off the road and flipped, killing her teenage sister. She kept shooting video after her sister died. Sanchez faces charges of DUI and vehicular manslaughter.

Meanwhile, a closed Facebook group called “Free Obdulia Sanchez!” popped up with more than 6,000 members. It had previously been a group to discuss LGBT issues, and the name changed after the crash and live video came to light.
— Sacramento Bee, 7/25/17

There are other instances of narcissism-driven livestreams by young people run amok, justified by racebaiters simply because the perpetrators were black and the hate was directed at then-President-elect Donald Trump.

Adults even livestream at times and places considered quite inappropriate because it’s all about them.

What we have is a convergence of bad parenting (and other adults) where children, regardless of their level of responsibility, are getting whatever they want and being allowed to do whatever they want with it, no matter how reckless they behave and are selectively excused.

Obdulia Sanchez is a child who made an error in judgement. She is being made a scapegoat for an incident that took the life of her 14-year-old sister, but it is not Obdulia’s fault. She should not be held responsible for this terrible tragedy, which says more about our society and what is deemed acceptable. We need to look at society and see where we went wrong, and how we can prevent this from happening in the future, but there is NO REASON why Obdulia should bear the brunt of the consequences.
— “Free Obdulia Sanchez!” Facebook page

We have a culture that rewards narcissism and an industry that feeds into the notion that everyone wants to see YOU, what YOU are doing while YOU are doing it and that industry has deliberately targeted young people who don’t buy the smartphones and pay for the service.

A 14-year-old survivor of a deadly car crash in California that was livestreamed on Instagram said she isn’t mad at anyone and doesn’t blame the driver. Instead, Manuela Seja blamed social media, which she said has taken over people’s lives and is only going to become more prevalent, television station KSEE in Fresno reported Monday.
— Associated Press, 4/26/17

Their parents do; parents who succumb to the pressure and whining inflicted by spoiled children who won’t relent until they get what they want and then act all shocked when their children commit unspeakable acts, blame everyone else but themselves and whine about what’s going to happen to them, heaven forbid.

Obdulia Sanchez was sentenced Thursday to six years and four months in prison for gross vehicular manslaughter, DUI and child endangerment stemming from a July 2017 crash in which her 14-year-old sister died. Sanchez, 18, of Stockton, had captured the crash – and the moments before and after – on live Instagram video that went viral worldwide.

Sanchez was detained at the scene after she was belligerent due to the death of her sister, reportedly kicking and spitting at medics and police as they responded. She was arrested after a blood test at Los Banos Memorial Hospital revealed her blood alcohol content was registered at 0.106 about 90 minutes after the crash.
— Merced Sun-Star, 2/8/18

Remember the Free Obdulia Sanchez! Facebook page that said the she was being made a scapegoat and the accident wasn’t her fault but we now know she was driving alcohol impaired and underage. Yeah, not her fault….

The genie is out of the bottle and the general public are at the mercy of the narcissistic youth who do stupid shit while livestreaming their antics to their online friends. It’s just a matter of who is blessed enough to avoid contact with them.

While we’re told we live in an age where free speech is embraced, there are those who just can’t let people discuss their points of view without interjections that are personal and vile.

As a matter of full disclosure, I don’t spend my time scouring progressive posts just so I can pick fights in comment forums. First of all, those I would be insulting would know who I am because I either go by “Bob Parks” or “BlackAndRight” so I’m easily spotted. But many of these trolls engage in personal attacks that are sometimes totally unrelated to the topic in an effort to discourage the very free speech they claim to champion.

And now there’s scientific proof that these people are truly assholes.

Online trolls have serious personality issues such as Machiavellianism, one of the biggest studies into trolling has found. Researchers say that online commenters display traits that are Narcissistic, psychopathic, and sadistic and the worse the problems, the longer the person spent online.

They found the most common trait was to exhibit sadistic behaviour.

Researchers constructed the the Global Assessment of Internet Trolling, or GAIT, containing the following items that trolls were found to agree with:

I have sent people to shock websites for the lulz.

I like to troll people in forums or the comments section of websites.

I enjoy griefing other players in multiplayer games.

The more beautiful and pure a thing is, the more satisfying it is to corrupt.

I’m waiting to see a survey where they determine the political leanings of trolls.

That will be quite illuminating as if most trolls were conservative, it would be something we’d already have heard about.

According to SearchSecurity.com,

A cracker is someone who breaks into someone else’s computer system, often on a network; bypasses passwords or licenses in computer programs; or in other ways intentionally breaches computer security. A cracker can be doing this for profit, maliciously, for some altruistic purpose or cause, or because the challenge is there. Some breaking-and-entering has been done ostensibly to point out weaknesses in a site’s security system.

The term “cracker” is not to be confused with “hacker”. Hackers generally deplore cracking. However, as Eric Raymond, compiler of The New Hacker’s Dictionary notes, some journalists ascribe break-ins to “hackers.”

Meanwhile…

Here’s the often misused term,

Hacker is a term used by some to mean “a clever programmer” and by others, especially those in popular media, to mean “someone who tries to break into computer systems.”

1) Eric Raymond, compiler of The New Hacker’s Dictionary, defines a hacker as a clever programmer. A “good hack” is a clever solution to a programming problem and “hacking” is the act of doing it. Raymond lists five possible characteristics that qualify one as a hacker, which we paraphrase here:

* A person who enjoys learning details of a programming language or system

* A person who enjoys actually doing the programming rather than just theorizing about it

* A person capable of appreciating someone else’s hacking

* A person who picks up programming quickly

* A person who is an expert at a particular programming language or system, as in “Unix hacker”

Raymond deprecates the use of this term for someone who attempts to crack someone else’s system or otherwise uses programming or expert knowledge to act maliciously. He prefers the term cracker for this meaning.

When creating yesterday’s post, I thought about mimicking Fox News’ incorrect use of the work “hacker”, but I assumed those on the right, not encumbered by political correctness and thin skins. In some cases, I appear to have been wrong.