In January of 2022, we were informed the video violated their “community standards” and they demanded it be deleted. We went through their formal dispute process and this is the one time we lost.

We managed to rip the video from the Creator platform, albeit the resolution was greatly reduced.

Watch for yourself and ask if this video compilation was informative regarding Muslim treatment of our canine friends or “Islamophobia”.

…
As the parents of wonderful dogs over the years, this is horrifying and sadly common practice in certain parts of the world.

We’re constantly reminded how wonderful these “migrants” are and the media is fighting to counter the reality the natives are experiencing.

With Europe’s governments paralysed over what to do and tensions rising on the ground, there has been a surge in support for populist and far-right parties, who have used the opportunity to further anti-immigrant agendas. But not everywhere, and certainly not in Ferrette where Mayor Francois Cohendet has overseen a successful integration and says the migrants’ presence there is “not an issue” but just a part of the community’s normal life.
— The Local, 4/28/19

Perpetuating the “We mean you no harm” theme to protect the documented actions of “migrants” all over Europe is a near full time job as evidenced by the French no having to cover up a glimpse into the psyche of those who now walk their streets.

The French Police have been trying to cover up by removing all traces of this video to stop it from spreading online. There’s nothing graphic being shown, this is just damage control for the invaders but it ended up in failure as the video has stared to spread online and the people are double angry, once for the horrific act itself and twice for the fact that the French police is trying to cover up.

There is not much to comment about this video, other than the fact that it happened in France in some children’s playground. We know the girl is somewhere around 5 years old and the guy who filmed it was one of the Muslims who cornered the girl to abuse her.
— European Union Times, 3/22/19

Had this happened within a gated community where politicians and bureaucrats who insisted populations absorb and tolerate “migrants” who rape, riot, and kill while receiving benefits many of their own citizens are ineligible for, there would be hell to pay.

The French police made a French citizen delete this video of Arab men sexually harassing a small child in France from her twitter account today: pic.twitter.com/ab12IPyUdd

But because this only happens in the playgrounds of “ordinary people”, this is no big deal, a fluke, Islamophobia, hate, bigotry, Xenophobia, etc.

Please share this post as, for obvious reasons, we can’t on Facebook and Twitter.

WaPo: After a marathon late-night debate, Prince William County mosque plan approved
Inside NoVa: Mosque permit approved after 9-hour public hearing in Prince William County
WTOP: Pr. William Co. greenlights Nokesville mosque after years of debate
Fauquier Times: Supervisors approve mosque with sewer in Nokesville

But as this is a commentary site, here’s another perspective based on what we saw.

Three years ago, the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) found a space in the “Rural Crescent” in Prince William County. Our guess is that particular site was not only chosen because the price was far cheaper than a developed parcel in town with appropriate infrastructure, but because it is easily expandable.

However, there are rules. As the area is “zoned agricultural, development is limited to one home per 10 acres and connections to the public sewer line are generally prohibited” and almost all homes and farms utilize septic systems for waste. Many people have been denied “special use” permits in this area if their requirements failed the zoning rules.

But as we all know from years of experience in the United States and other parts of the world, Muslims do not believe the rules we have to live by applies to them. Most American businesses and schools would not require time out for Christian prayer, in fact, the American Civil Liberties Union would be the first to question the appropriateness and issue guidelines while they proudly support almost any freedom of Muslim expression in public areas. One pattern almost always emerges: if Muslim requests aren’t acted upon, they become very public demands that once accommodated generate new “requests”: foot washing facilities, etc….

Despite their proposed mosque not meeting current requirements, they demanded special treatment to tap into the sewer system; treatment none of the surrounding residents received.

And we could have sworn we saw a rather uptight Ibrahim Hooper, National Communications Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) standing right behind our camera.

As for the displays of “Islamophobia” some of those who spoke in favor of the mosque complained of, the worry some residents have is justified. On an almost daily basis around the world, we hear of horrific terror acts that maim and/or kill dozens or more. They’ve been carried out by those who are NOT screaming “Jesus is the greatest!” while running people over in large vehicles or slashing and/or shooting all those around them or blowing up concert-going tweens. These are people who scream “Allahu Akbar” during their terror acts and sometimes saying they did a bad thing just isn’t enough. Mass rapes, honor killings, and random murderous acts is a tough reputation to shake but calling others names for pointing out those actions done in your name is not very endearing. To date, we have yet to see ONE priest, pastor, or minister declare holy war on all those who don’t believe as they do, but we’re the Islamophobes who shouldn’t be listened to.

As far as what we experienced in the James J. McCoart Administration Building, right outside the chamber is a clearly-marked sign that read, “No food or drinks allowed in the chamber”, but what are rules to those who believe they don’t apply?

Good neighbors, eh?

We won’t even get into the five out of six cowardly Republicans who were elected to uphold the law they enforce on others, assure all will be treated equally, and jovially caved to political correctness out of fear of being called names (if not worse) and a veiled threat of a lawsuit. The “1000” or so Muslims and liberal allies who showed up at the hearing could have easily watched it on cable access television. They showed up in person to bully, intimidate, and it worked.

At the end of the night (morning), the mosque will be built and allowed a sewage infrastructure no other resident could acquire because it was never about equal treatment; it was about special treatment.

And if you think that Nokesville mosque will be limited to only 500 as they claim, let’s see how that looks a few years from now….

What British Muslims Really Think
Channel 4 and Trevor Phillips undertake and interpret a rigorous survey of the views of British Muslims on issues from gender equality and homosexuality to sympathy for violence and terrorism
— Channel 4 UK

Channel 4’s controversial documentary What British Muslims Really Think has prompted more than 200 complaints. It sparked a row after it commissioned a poll that found more than half of British Muslims think that homosexuality should be illegal.

The Office of Communications (Ofcom) said it had received 89 complaints about the programme, which aired on 13 April and was watched by 1.4 million viewers. Channel 4 said it had received around 130 complaints and another 20 messages that were “appreciative” of the programme.

The regulator said complaints included concerns about misleading information and that it risked increasing Islamophobia.

A Guardian panel of British Muslims who watched the programme last week were highly critical of the show, branding it “boring, inaccurate and sensationalist” and said it “reinforced the us vs them narrative”. They said the documentary’s methodology was “problematic and flawed” and it “suggested you’re either a liberal Muslim or slightly extreme”.

Ofcom said it would assess the complaints before deciding whether or not to launch a full investigation.
— The Guardian (UK), 4/21/16

BTW — The Guardian (while scrutinizing the methodology used in conducting the survey and its results) provided no information about those in that “panel of British Muslims” and we’re to take the news site’s word they and their sentiments actually existed.

What British Muslims Really Think is still available on Channel 4’s on-demand service, All4.

No, it’s not.

The 2016 documentary is no longer available for worldwide, public viewing and its not like Channel 4 videos are removed because they’re no longer timely or recent. “Muslim Drag Queens” originally aired on August 24, 2015 and it’s still available for viewing to this day.

Knowing the liberal media as we do and predicting how easily they’d succumb to the online bullying of the politically correct, “What British Muslims Really Think” is presented in it’s unedited entirety and you can see if what was presented is truly Islamophobic as defined by the PC’d or a more accurate depiction of reality, given ongoing events.