In typical liberal fashion, a group of sad-faced, so-called civil rights leaders converged in an attention getting attempt to issue demands over the person who defeated them at the ballot box, and given their chutzpah, they expect their demands and emotional pleas will be heard.

The Southern Poverty Law Center‘s Richard Cohen ($333,296 salary), with new concerns about “hate” in schools, has now increased the number of post-election hate crime incidents to 860 without citing specific cases that can be backed up with verified police investigations.

Remember, only a few days ago the SPLC admitted that “many” of the cases they include in their tally are “anecdotal”: unproven or untrue. But this time, take them at their word.

La Raza (imagine the screech had any American group named themselves “The Race”)President Janet Murguia ($362,922 salary) describes the fright within a community of individuals that knowingly violated our sovereign border because of the campaign rhetoric of Donald Trump. However, neither Murguia nor any other leader of La Raza has ever denounced the racism by Latino students in public schools all over the American southwest. Neither Murguia nor any other leader of La Raza has ever denounced the crimes committed on all communities by illegal aliens. But yet, on behalf of all the frightened DREAMers and immigrants in general, it’s up to Donald Trump to reach out to all those who took to the streets with Mexican flags and burned his effigy in the street.

Muslim Advocates shared a map on hate crimes since the election, however Director Brenda Abdelall (salary not available) made NO mention of the unvetted Somali Muslim who attacked students at Ohio State or the Somali Muslim who attacked shoppers at the mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota, or the other Muslim-on-American terror attacks that invoke Muslim advocate demands that we not judge lest we be called Islamophobes.

Seriously, Abdelall acts like words are worse than being shot or run over by a car before being stabbed or shot.

One of the most pitiful rants came from Randi Weingarten ($543,150 salary), president of the American Federation of Teachers, who constantly claims she advocates for “the children” but won’t hesitate to put those children at unsupervised risk when she’ll call for a strike to get more taxpayer money sent to failing public school teachers. She demands Donald Trump call for the hate crimes committed “in his name” to end while not citing one proven example, and while she lamented the recent rise in the use of the swastika, we all know the left has perfected the art of staging hate crimes in the name of “raising awareness”.

Wade Henderson ($225,303 salary), president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights ended the initial remarks by imploring the President-Elect condemn the racists within his supporters, reach out to the very people who called him a racist and slandered others with charges of racism without genuine proof.

Of course, there was one little thing the SPLC conveniently left out of their “presentation”….

The Montgomery, Ala.-based nonprofit self-censored results from a key question it asked educators — whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: “I have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students.”

Asked last week to provide the data, SPLC initially said it was having a hard time getting the information “from the researchers.” Pressed, SPLC spokeswoman Kirsten Bokenkamp finally revealed that “about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question.”

Bokenkamp did not provide an explanation for the absence of such a substantial metric — at least 2,000 bias-related incidents against white students — from the report, which focuses instead on “anti-immigrant sentiment,” “anti-Muslim sentiment” and “slurs about students of color” related to the election.
— NY Post, 12/5/16

Didn’t hear THIS from the media that so gleefully ran with the Southern Poverty Law Center’s desired conclusions. Then again, how many times have we heard of conveniently omitted, important facts that could’ve dismantled a slanderous narrative?

So, what is this really all about? All of the above who were presenters at the National Press Conference represent nonprofits and anyone with a vibrant email inbox knows these dot orgs spent a lot of time fundraising against Donald Trump during the election in a pitiful losing effort. Christmas is coming, bloated salaries need to be met, and now is the time to push the panic button for all who’ll expose a bleeding heart.

We sincerely doubt Mr. Trump watched these clowns this morning on CSPAN and who could blame him?

And for some reason once some people come here, they attempt to make America resemble the place they from which they fled. The next question may seem provocative; there’s a point so work with me on this one.

Are Latinos intellectually inferior?

Understandably an offensive question to most.

I ask because every other immigrant group that comes to the United States seems to have been given the benefit of the doubt that they have intelligence. Conservatives have always stated the importance of assimilation, so this sentiment of inferiority comes from, again, the intellectually-superior Left.

For example, when you get on a city bus in Boston, the public signs are printed in English and Spanish. Not English and Gaelic or English and Italian, as the Irish and Italian population dominate there. In Chicago, the public signs are in English and Spanish, not English and Polish. In New York, English and Spanish, not English and Yiddish.

I think you know where I am going with this.

For some reason, someone (most probably a liberal) decided all public signs should be written in English and Spanish. I think that’s insulting but predictable considering who probably came up with the policy in the first place. Almost every other immigrant group was expected to assimilate through language, except Latinos. It seems apparent that liberals think Latinos are just too damn stupid and need that crutch. Also keeping in mind that liberals play the entitlement and victim game better than anyone does, some Latinos now expect Americans must learn Spanish so we’ll be a part of their America.

English is the worldwide language of commerce. People in other countries learn English so they can do business with us. Sure, some people here learn other languages to aid in commerce as well, but for the most part, English is where it’s at.

Most immigrant children are immediately immersed in English-only classes in school. In fact, their parents wouldn’t have it any other way. Most Latino parents want the same for their kids. But liberal educators fought to continue bilingual education classes even though years of study showed the only people who benefited by those classes were the teachers who earned extra money for their bilinguistics. Here in California, it took a voter initiative to eliminate those classes (which, of course, was later partially overturned), and even though there were marked improvements in Latino children’s performance, activists and some teachers protested.

Is this notion of multiculturalism really such a great goal? Have the hyphens really helped bring us together, or are they intentionally keeping us apart?

There’s now an entire class of people who don’t have to learn English and can still eke out a living: not a very good one, to be sure. But to the delight of liberals, these immigrants will need public assistance and that assures the growth of Democrat government. These people can take a driver’s test in Spanish and get a license. They can go to supermarkets and not need to speak a word of English. They can get benefits from government social workers and not speak a word of English.

I was in a public building in the San Fernando Valley a couple of weeks ago. Not only were there no forms in English (only in Spanish) but there were also Mexican flags placed prominently on workers desks. Yes, I do have a problem with that.

We have Zita Wilensky who worked in a Miami-Dade government office for 16 years that was terminated after being entrapped by her Latina boss. Wilensky failed to learn Spanish in 60 days (even though it was not a requirement for her hiring since Florida officially recognizes English as the state language). When her boss, posing as an abuse victim, called and spoke in Spanish, the ‘gringa’ (as her all-Latino staff called her) transferred the call to a Spanish-speaking operator. The woman was fired.

Sometimes I wish I were a lawyer. Sometimes….

The beauty of America is that people have the right to be undereducated. They have the right to be ignorant. They thereby, have to accept the after effects of their actions. They will be relegated to low-wage employment. Activists can call it racism, discrimination, and xenophobia. I agree, and I point my finger right back at the activists.

These are the same National Council of La Raza (The Race) bigots who defend bilingual education. Funny, these activists speak the Queen’s English. They wear $300 outfits and some are lawyers. Speaking English seems to have done right by them, however they aggressively defend someone else’s right to stay in the dark.

To answer my question: no. I do not believe Latinos are intellectually inferior. However, some liberals clearly do. These liberals are policy makers and I accuse them of being a victim factory. They wish to create an underclass, so as to keep them down, keep them ignorant, keep them full of envy, keep them full of hate, and keep them seeking before an election. After the election is over and the Liberal wins, things go right back to normal.

If Latinos, like Blacks, would just once vote the other way, they might see a change because they would see a change of attitude.

Conservatives always tell us what we can do. Liberals always tell us what we can’t and the positive message is preferable. Maybe one day, some minorities will wake up and join the rest of America where all can achieve.

As one people.

In one language.