“It was as if my very presence in the White House had triggered a deep-seated panic, a sense that the natural order had been disrupted,” Mr Obama writes. According to a copy of the book obtained by CNN, the former president’s new book deeply explores how the Republican party evolved during his eight years in office and reacted in response to his presidency. “For millions of Americans spooked by a Black man in the White House, he promised an elixir for their racial anxiety,” in the first volume of his new memoir: A Promised Land.

It’s been almost four years since a half-black man was in the White House for eight years. Many of us have been relieved that his race-obsessed provocations were out of our lives but seeing how he’s making it all about himself (and race again), rightly to sell a book, a response was in order and so posted on Twitter.

I correctly emphasize half-black as there are always family dynamics that outsiders don’t understand and wisely don’t interject themselves in. Many non-blacks, especially younger types, have no idea of some of the dirty laundry that’s been stirring internally for decades so when they do chime in, it’s done to placate feelings of the near-total ignorant.

The dance scene in Spike Lee’s 1988 “School Daze” is a musical rendition of this internal “discussion”.

Liberals, especially those running the entertainment industry, clearly prefer light-skinned blacks. They’ve always been considered “non-threatening”. Look at the most well known black singers in the music industry and the vast majority are the light-skinned. Internal tension and resentment is understandable.

 
Despite his “charm”, it could be honestly debated if Barack Obama would’ve even been considered to be a viable presidential candidate if he was a dark-skinned black man.

He was wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama — a ‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one’.
— Sen. Harry Reid on Obama’s “racial appeal”

I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.
— Sen. Joe Biden

Look at who’s possibly positioned to be the next Vice President of the United States. A light-skinned “woman of color” with no Negro dialect unless she wants to have one.

Sadly, the most incendiary race toxicity comes from the light-skinned who are constantly trying to prove their blackness.

2023: Rachael Rollins resigns as U.S. attorney after damning accusations of ‘abuse of authority’

Let’s not leave out the honorary mentions of a growing list of white people, “identifying” as blacks, trying to prove their “blackness”.

The media loves the halfricans, they are empowered, and will be in our faces as long as they’re useful to create as mush racial tumult as possible… in a non-threatening way.

We now have another case of a liberal using minority status. It’s yet to be determined as to what benefit….

A day after the parents of Rachel Dolezal, the President of the Spokane Chapter of the NAACP, said she has been misrepresenting herself as black for years, the NAACP says they are standing by Dolezal.

As usual, if you remember the Los Angeles Chapter’s “black holes” public exhibition of racist stupidity, it would appear the Spokane NAACP is more interested in not looking irresponsibly gullible, and are doubling down for some unknown reason.

For 106 years, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has held a long and proud tradition of receiving support from people of all faiths, races, colors and creeds. NAACP Spokane Washington Branch President Rachel Dolezal is enduring a legal issue with her family, and we respect her privacy in this matter. One’s racial identity is not a qualifying criteria or disqualifying standard for NAACP leadership.

Seriously?

Knowing the NAACP as we know the NAACP, we’re expected to believe if a “white” Rachel Dolezal walked into their office and expressed interest of being their branch president, they’d embrace her with open arms. Puh-leez….

Today’s National Organization for the Advancement of Colored People would laugh her out of the office.

There has to be something here that has yet to be made public. It’s clear Ms. Dolezal has engaged in some kind of racial mischaracterization, created a “hate hoax” as a way of garnering sympathetic attention (as liberals have done numerous times in the past).

And it appears her parents know a little something about her and have no problems throwing her under the bus.

Dolezal, a multi-media artist, professor of Africana studies at Eastern Washington University and former instructor at North Idaho College in Coeur d’Alene, has reportedly made similar ethnicity claims to local media outlets. In recent years, she has portrayed herself physically, and on social media platforms, as a woman of black African-American heritage.

However, her parents, Ruthanne and Larry Dolezal, who are both white and live in the Troy/Libby area in Montana, told The Press their daughter is not African-American. They backed up the claim with a copy of their daughter’s birth certificate and photos. The images show a younger, pale, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Dolezal who looks much different than the woman with caramel-colored skin now leading the Spokane NAACP and helping review claims of police misconduct in that city.

“Rachel is very good at using her artistic skills to transform herself,” Ruthanne said in a recent telephone interview.

And Rachel’s told whoppers that her parents are almost gleefully revealing.

Ruthanne also clarified that Izaiah, who Dolezal often says is her son, is actually Dolezal’s adopted brother. Between 1993 and 1995, Ruthanne and Larry adopted four black infants: Ezra, Izaiah, Zachariah and Esther.

What this seems to imply is Rachel Dolezal is either crazy or a raging bitch her parents couldn’t wait to publicly embarrass and they were apparently extremely patient knowing the opportunity would come (and it sure did).

Can you say “pathological”?

And sorry, if an institution as racist as the NAACP can’t tell the difference between a black woman and a white woman, what does that say? Then again, their former national president was the whitest black man many of us have ever seen.

Remember, we’re talking about a liberal, Democrat liar who must be excused as long as possible.