Case in point….

It was pretty jarring earlier this month when the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court took the bench for the first time since the omicron surge over the holidays. All were now wearing masks. All, that is, except Justice Neil Gorsuch. What’s more, Justice Sonia Sotomayor was not there at all, choosing instead to participate through a microphone setup in her chambers. Sotomayor has diabetes, a condition that puts her at high risk for serious illness, or even death, from COVID-19. She has been the only justice to wear a mask on the bench since last fall when, amid a marked decline in COVID-19 cases, the justices resumed in-person arguments for the first time since the onset of the pandemic.

Now, though, the situation had changed with the omicron surge, and according to court sources, Sotomayor did not feel safe in close proximity to people who were unmasked. Chief Justice John Roberts, understanding that, in some form asked the other justices to mask up. They all did. Except Gorsuch, who, as it happens, sits next to Sotomayor on the bench. His continued refusal since then has also meant that Sotomayor has not attended the justices’ weekly conference in person, joining instead by telephone.
— Nina Totenberg, NPR, 1/18/21

Sounds pretty insensitive and potentially dangerous.

However, it doesn’t appear to be true as New York Times Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak was one of the first to dispute Totenberg’s musing.

NPR strongly defended Totenberg’s reporting, pointing out that the justices’ statement does not directly contradict their story.

“Totenberg never reported that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask, nor did she report that anyone admonished him,” NPR spokesman Ben Fishel said in a statement.
— Business Insider, 1/18/22

Totenberg’s implications were clear enough as was the response from the justices in question.

The court on Wednesday issued an unusual three-sentence statement from Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch. It read: “Reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask surprised us. It is false. While we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends.”
— ABC News, 1/19/22

Nina Totenberg, “legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio focusing primarily on the activities and politics of the Supreme Court of the United States” cites no one in her piece. No anonymous source or official speaking under condition of anonymity, zip, zero, nada; a clear flunking of Journalism 1.01.

Turns out she was inspired by the opinion of another conservative-hating liberal.

One justice, Sonia Sotomayor, who had previously been the only justice to wear a mask on the bench, participated remotely from her chambers. Sotomayor has diabetes, which is a risk factor for more severe illness with covid. She also is, or would have been, Gorsuch’s seat mate for the nearly four-hour-long argument session.

The court, having resumed in-person arguments, retains strict limits on who can attend and strict rules for those allowed inside the chamber. Reporters and lawyers must wear masks — N95 masks, not the less-effective cloth variety — and test negative for covid. In fact, two of the lawyers who argued against the Biden administration’s vaccine mandates had to do so remotely after testing positive. And instead of being crammed cheek by jowl in the press section, reporters, along with the justices’ law clerks, are spaced throughout the otherwise-empty chamber.

These rules and practices all make sense for the court (where five justices, including Sotomayor, are over 65) and for the public. Indeed, they offer a model for responsible workplace behavior in an age of omicron.

Which brings me to the question: Where was Gorsuch’s mask?
— Ruth Marcus, Washington Post, 1/7/22

Marcus’ “op-ed” got all this rolling, Totenberg lit the fuse given, and it was dutifully rewritten and distributed.

Slate: The Even Bigger Problem With Neil Gorsuch’s Decision Not to Wear a Mask
Yahoo News: Gorsuch defied a request from Chief Justice Roberts to wear a mask out of respect for Sotomayor
CNN: Gorsuch declines to wear mask, as Sotomayor works from her office
BizPacReview: Gorsuch reportedly refuses to mask-up, ‘forcing’ Sotomayor to work remotely
UK Independent: Diabetic Sotomayor forced to work remotely, Gorsuch refuses to wear mask
Huffington Post: Gorsuch Reportedly Refuses To Wear Mask In Supreme Court, Forcing Others To Call In
NY Magazine: Neil Gorsuch Reportedly Refused John Roberts’s Request to Wear a Mask
Boston Globe: Justice Gorsuch reportedly refused to wear mask during Supreme Court arguments

Either Marcus and Totenberg made it all up, the Washington Post and NPR accepted it without asking her to provide the customary attribution, OR Marcus and Totenberg made it up and it was blindly accepted by the Washington Post and NPR because it was what they wanted to believe, their audience would also accept it because they want to be believe it as true and are too lazy to verify it.

It’s not like so-called liberal journalists making shit up never happened before and it would be interesting to see how justices would rule if #DefundNPR ever made it before them?

This applies not to just those on social media. You can also apply this to the elected and unelected bureaucrats in local, state, and federal government; specifically those who have direct control over our Constitutionally-protected freedoms. More dangerous are those who have their taxpayer-funded jobs (with no legislative oversight or accountability) for life.

During oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court regarding vaccine mandates in businesses, Justice Sonya Sotomayor showed all just how perilous our freedoms are it this time.

One would think Sotomayor would be a tad more prepared before opening her “wise Latina” mouth.

Omicron Variant Isn’t Deadly, South African Medical Chair Claims
First real-world study suggests Omicron less severe than earlier variants
New Studies Suggest Omicron Infections Are Less Severe Than Delta Ones
Omicron variant leads to less severe symptoms, deaths, new study says
Infectious Omicron could be 99 per cent LESS deadly than other strains, daily cases fall for third day in a row
Could Omicron be even LESS deadly than seasonal flu? Scientists believe ultra-infectious strain may kill 100 TIMES fewer people than Delta (and mortality rates were ALREADY similar to influenza before the variant emerged)

It kinda’ makes you wonder how many SCOTUS decisions were botched due to the arrogant ignorance of some of the justices….

While millions of Americans are removed from social media and or harassed by the intellectually intolerant because of their views, Sotomayor is allowed to spew clearly incorrect information she probably consumed from MSNBC, NPR, The New York Times, and maybe even Democracy Now! One would think her opinions would be guided by an even-tempered approach, but we also know she’s also led by a “wise Latina” arrogance where what she believes is truth can be used to inflict generational damage to the country.