The US President has faced a backlash over the informal way he greeted the kingdom’s de facto ruler on his arrival in Jeddah on Friday. Critics have said the fist bump was inappropriate given US suspicions that the Crown Prince was responsible for the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi — and Biden’s subsequent 2020 campaign trail pledge to turn Saudi Arabia into a “pariah”.

But Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan played down the controversy in an interview with CNN’s Nic Robertson hours after the President left Jeddah on Saturday.

“I see the image as a win for President Biden,” bin Farhan said.
— CNN, 7/17/22

While Khashoggi’s murder was horrific, there weren’t too many news organizations who demanded the last three American presidents avoid the appearance of undue courtesy after the 2,977 fatalities and over 25,000 injuries that resulted at the hands of Saudi citizens on September 11, 2001. Al Qaeda was the prime culprit, according to the 9/11 Commission Report, but subsequent lawsuits by the families of 9/11 victims implicated Saudi officials, not to mention FBI files that have still not been released.

Where was the outrage and demands from the media that Presidents George Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump not visit Saudi Arabia after the horrors of 9/11?

4/25/02: President Bush Meets with Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia
1/15/08: President Bush in Saudi Arabia
4/20/16: Barack Obama holds talks with Saudi Arabia’s King Salman
9/23/16: Obama Vetoes Bill to Let 9/11 Families Sue Saudi Arabia
5/16/17: President Trump Is Visiting Saudi Arabia to Cement a Friendship

There was little media consternation, if any, because the World Trade Center attack was just a news story for them. There were no interviews of the hundreds of widows from that day. But because a journalist was murdered, it was a media all-hands-on-deck.

Washington Post: Biden says he confronted Saudis directly on Khashoggi
Variety: ‘The View’ Host Sunny Hostin Slams Biden for Fist-Bumping Saudi Crown Prince and ‘Normalizing a Murderer’
ABC News: Biden says he raised Khashoggi murder with Saudi crown prince
Newsweek: Biden Scoffs at Reporter’s ‘Silly Question’ About Khashoggi Killing
CNBC: Biden said he raised murder of Jamal Khashoggi with Saudi leaders after MBS fist bump
New York Post: Khashoggi fiancée says Biden owns ‘blood’ of next MBS victim after fist bump
NPR: She was married to Khashoggi. She wants accountability as Biden lands in Saudi Arabia
The Hill: Biden betrays Khashoggi, campaign promises in quest for Saudi oil
CNN: Wolf Blitzer presses Saudi diplomat who was in meeting with Biden on Khashoggi’s murder
U.S. News & World Report: Biden Confronts Saudi Crown Prince Over Khashoggi Murder, Expects Action on Energy
Business Insider: Bernie Sanders rebukes Biden’s visit to Saudi Arabia, says the US shouldn’t ‘be maintaining a warm relationship with a dictatorship’

The privileged left is predictable, as evidenced by our ongoing documentation of how indifferent they are when bad things happen to the people as opposed to how batshit indignant they get when bad things happen to one of them. The media has the immediate megaphone and they will stop the presses when the unfortunate happens to one of them.

More to come. You can be sure of it.

On December 3-4, you can endure slow-talking Al Gore and his eighth annual 24 Hours of Reality: Protect Our Planet, Protect Ourselves, complete with certified has-beens, never-really-weres and on-the-way-outs like Sting & Shaggy, Moby, Jeff Goldblum & the Mildred Snitzer Orchestra, Bob Weir and Wolf Bros, the Goo Goo Dolls, David Crosby, Jaden Smith, Bill Nye, Téa Leoni, Claire Danes, Mandy Patinkin, and a bunch of sanctimonious bureaucrats lecturing on what YOU should do to “save the planet”… things they exempt themselves of.

or…

You can spend an hour and 15 minutes watching one of all-time best, unapologetic, widely-attacked, yet most informative video productions on the topic; complete with experts; not emotional, funding-dependent academics and activists.

The Great Global Warming Swindle is still one the most controversial documentaries on the topic. Check out as much as you wish of Al Gore’s talk-a-thon and see which position on “climate change” and the dangers of C02 makes more sense to you.

Oh, and while they claim this is all about a “discussion”, Al Gore’s live YouTube stream has “disabled” chats AND comments.

This is no surprise.

See how much concern (or lack thereof) Gore shows for the plight of poor African nations he happily denies the opportunity to develop while his privileged Western neophyte devotees stream his live production on their iPhones.

In listening to the hysterics of the climate change believers, it’s not an acceptance of even the remote possibility that there may be other explanations for the change in the climate. It’s more the arrogant denial that, heaven forbid, there is even the slightest possibility that they may have been suckered and are thus, very wrong.

Impeachment isn’t enough.

Impeachment would remedy Trump”s “high crimes and misdemeanors.” But impeachment would not remedy Trump’s unconstitutional presidency because it would leave in place his vice president, White House staff and Cabinet, as well as all the executive orders he issued and all the legislation he signed, and the official record of his presidency.

The only response to an unconstitutional presidency is to annul it. Annulment would repeal all of it – recognizing that such appointments, orders, rules, and records were made without constitutional authority.
— Robert Reich, 8/24/18

The problem with such irrational thinking is it comes back to bite you.

The most recent example came thanks to former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, first in 2005.

If all goes as planned, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) will rise after several days of debate beginning today over one of President Bush’s judicial nominees and call for an end to Democrats’ delaying tactics. The presiding officer will then rule in his favor.

Democrats will protest the ruling and ask for a vote to overturn it. The Republican leader will seek to table that appeal. If Frist and the GOP majority prevail, a long tradition of filibustering will be narrowed and a new precedent will be set allowing the Republicans to force a vote on a nomination with a simple majority instead of three-fifths of the Senate.

But Democrats contend that the Republicans are essentially breaking the rules to change the rules. “If there were ever an example of an abuse of power, this is it,” said Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-NV). “The filibuster is the last check we have against the abuse of power in Washington.”
— Washington Post, 5/18/05

But Harry Reid’s position began to unravel when Democrats assumed the majority….

In 2008, Reid continued to condemn the fact that the Republicans even contemplated using the nuclear option: “The Senate was set up to be different, that was the genius, the vision of our Founding Fathers. That’s why you have the ability to filibuster, and to terminate filibuster. They wanted to get rid of all of that,” Reid said.

Then he was asked if he would ever consider invoking the nuclear option himself: “As long as I am the leader, the answer’s no,” Reid promised. “I think we should just forget that. That is a black chapter in the history of the Senate. I hope we never ever get to that again because I really do believe it will ruin our country.”

Fast-forward to 2013. Now, Democrats held the White House and a Senate majority. The Republican minority had been stalling nominations and appointments by Obama, including filibustering the nomination of former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel for secretary of defense. Senate Democrats decided to go nuclear after the Senate GOP made clear that they had no intention of allowing three vacancies on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to be filled.
— PolitiFact, 11/22/13

But the most fun example came courtesy of the super-majority Democrats in the Massachusetts Legislature.

In 2004, the state’s junior senator, John Kerry, was the Democratic presidential nominee. Party leaders knew that if Kerry won in November, state law allowed the governor — then Republican Mitt Romney — to appoint Kerry’s successor, and that person would presumably be a Republican. So, the Democratic leadership of the legislature drew up a measure to strip the governor of his senatorial appointment power.

The measure passed both chambers and was vetoed by Romney. The Democrats then muscled a two-thirds majority to override the veto. Of course, Kerry never won the presidency, but the law remained on the books.

Fast-forward to 2009. Democrats realized that the law they had enacted in 2004 forced the state to have only one senator for roughly five months — and after Kennedy’s death, that meant the state would be short one senator. From a political standpoint, that meant the U.S. Senate would have one less Democrat at a time when a Democratic president was trying to reach a 60-vote threshold to enact landmark legislation on Kennedy’s signature issue, health care. And this time, the governor, Deval Patrick, is a Democrat and presumably would appoint someone from his party.

So legislators quickly passed legislation that would keep the special election but still allow the governor to appoint an interim senator to serve until the special election. The measure passed both chambers, and on Sept. 24, 2009, Patrick named former Democratic National Committee chairman Paul Kirk, a Kennedy family friend, as the interim senator.
— Politifact, 9/24/09

So, if Robert Reich and Democrats really want to strip Donald Trump of his presidency and annul all of his accomplishments, fine.

But politics continues to remain a rather consistently cyclical thing and one day, there will be a Democrat in the White House; a Democrat who may do really bad things. If Democrats do manage to have President Trump’s presidency stripped, precedent will be set and there will be calls to do the very same thing to that Democrat, deserved or not.

Who’ll be screaming like a stuck pig then, Robert?

There would rightfully be national outrage had anyone thought it a great idea to create a docudrama of an assassination of the first half-black president. Producing such a movie of George W. Bush earned the makers critical acclaim and those who had a problem with it were told to lighten up: it’s just a movie.

And after the first weekend, Southside with You has pulled in a measly $3 million which makes it as much of a dud as the Obama presidency.

Of course, we’re talking about the division within the Republican Party because of the presidential candidacy of Donald Trump. The one talking point repeated by most is that he “can’t be bought”. There’s more to that.

Campaign Leeches

You’d have to live close to The Beltway to understand how the Donald Trump campaign has upset the standard operating procedure of Washington, D.C. and the consultant, political operative class. The easiest way to describe the filth that exists here is with an analogy.

Let’s say we’re talking about the NFL Playoffs and on a given weekend, eight teams played and four were defeated; their season ended. What would we be saying about the dedication and loyalty to the fans if players on the losing teams started sending their resumes to the teams that were beating them before the game was even over? That NEVER happens in sports but it DOES in politics because these staffers have no loyalty to a candidate or his or her supporters; ONLY to themselves and how much donor cash they can suck into their own bank accounts.

That’s why we saw Reagan-Bush people working on the McCain campaign, Reagan-Bush-McCain people working on the Romney campaign, and now Reagan-Bush-McCain-Romney people working on today’s campaigns, not to mention all of the other primary loser’s people.

That is, except on the Trump campaign.

Donald Trump has dared use his own money and selected a team from people he obviously knows and trust; not from the large pool of proven, experienced win-or-losers who care more about the paycheck than the the American people, and THAT is one reason why the establishment hates Trump. He hasn’t opened his checkbook to them as he was supposed to.

And that brings us to…

Conservative Media ‘Leaders’

We have all these so-called “conservative” leaders who no one elected, have never run for a political office (thus really sticking their necks out), defining conservatism as they so deem, and anyone who dares not follow their lead will incur their wrath, for all that’s really worth.

So, who the hell are THEY?

Has any one of you ever voted for Dana Loesch to be a “leader”? How about Erick Erickson or Brent Bozell or Katie Pavlich or Jenny Beth Martin or Rich Lowry, as well as any of the others who work at glorified, top-heavy nonprofit blogs dependent on big money donors or the charitable donations of retirees?

NOTE: We don’t mean to dash any inflated egos but there are tens of millions of good Republicans out there who’ve never heard of RedState, the Media Research Center, Townhall, the Heritage Foundation, National Review, and/or the myriad of self-important blogs that believe they are oh-so influential with Republican politicians.

Do Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, Michael Medved, or Hugh Hewitt remember what happened to the Oprah Winfrey empire once she publicly chose sides with the black guy and rubbed it in the face of her audience members that supported the white woman? To say her empire tanked without recovery would be an understatement, and the arrogance of these so-called conservatives to believe the audience they presently insult will beg to come back home once the general election dust clears is .

I believe Rush Limbaugh remembers, which is why he’s observing the competition and not favoring one opponent over another.

They Believe They’re Immune From Backlash

Self-anointed conservative leaders sure believe they’re your representatives and have come right out and said that anyone who supports Donald Trump is an ignoramus, has mental issues, or worse. Mark Levin arrogantly continues to rant for Ted Cruz, redefining conservatism and rewriting the creds of Ronald Reagan, hoping his listeners won’t know they’re being played.

Some of these blogs and/or nonprofits hit up Donald Trump for money, were turned down, and are having a collective “tude” whenever possible on Fox News, because knowing some of them as I do (as well as their “conservative” convictions), had they received that big check from The Donald, their tune would be 180 degrees opposite.

The unelected “conservative” leaders are as intolerant as black Democrats who banish family members who (oh, Lawd) rebel and vote Republican and feel justified in using the taboo racial slurs against them. A vote for someone who hasn’t paid his dues and spread donor money to the party leech apparatus is misguided, and anyone who votes Trump is thought to be unworthy of intellectual consideration and is insulted on-air with the arrogance conservatives have attacked liberals about for years.

The presidential campaign of Donald Trump has turned the sunlight on the process. Not only are we witnessing the attempt by the Republican Party (and their has-beens) to nullify the will of the people, we are seeing the political whore class exposed for the disloyal, money grubbers they are.

Donald Trump is NOT with the refined, scripted, phony consultant-class program, is still winning, and that just pisses them off, while millions of others are delighted that “change” isn’t something exclusive to the left.

As a public service, Donald Trump didn’t give the leeches his money. Taken as a declaration of war by the campaign staff class, the Republican donor class has poured millions of dollars into these bruised-egos and their value (or lack their of) is being revealed to the world.

So, let the RNC and the others try and meddle with the will of the people. You KNOW, Mr. Trump has an app ready for that and he’ll make sure it hurts.

But why let reality spoil a good liberal talking point?

Over the years, however, we’ve seen political violence and it’s almost always committed by young people on the left. Whether we’re talking demonstrations at political party conventions, World Trade Organization and/or G8 summits, we usually see the same types congregate: young people in bandanas or skull caps covering their faces who routinely destroy public and private property under the guise of their right to assemble and speak freely.

While no organized Tea Party event has resulted in mass arrests and property damage, it’s the right that’s been smeared as the violent “crazies”. But why are young people so prone to political violence and who’s putting them up to it? The very people who aren’t dumb enough to be present at a political rally where damage and arrests may occur: the radical professoriate.

Granted, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin can reach a large audience, but when they (or their message) become annoying you can change the channel. You can walk with no repercussions. Young people don’t have those options when sitting in front of a liberal teacher who either tells his them Bush’s “tones” was like Hitler’s or people trapped in the burning Twin Towers are “little Eichmanns” who basically had the horrific death coming.

We have young people who curiously go from politically-ignorant one summer to hardcore activists who put themselves between Israeli Army bulldozers and Hamas hideouts. Is this the normal thinking of a young person or were they worked up into a frenzy by a teacher that more than has the common sense to place their own bodies between construction equipment and buildings?

We now have politicians who want to make it illegal for a private citizen to threaten a lawmaker (which I thought it already was), yet it was okay for then-Senator Barack Obama to tell his millions of young followers to crash the sites of those who opposed him, “push back” and get in our faces.

I would consider that violent speech considering what would happen to me if I attempted to “push back” or get in the face of the president. Personally, I can’t recall an instance where a conservative told his or her followers to flood the sites of opposition while they routinely do that to ours.

Sarah Palin’s website was hacked by the punk son of a state legislator and it’s easy to understand why the left sought leniency for him. He was probably indoctrinated by the same liberal academics who teach the virtues of civil disobedience and “by any means necessary”. While still under some kind of investigation, I think we’ll one day find that the young people behind the shutdown of corporate websites hostile to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange are probably college students whose grades (thus their futures) were dependent on staying in the good graces of professors who can be quite vindictive towards those who stray off message.

While the ratio of conservative-to-liberal teachers is very low, the instances of students documenting abuse by conservatives is almost non-existent, but we routinely see press reports of students who sat through America-hating, Bush and Republican-bashing, socialism-praising presentations by professors who believe that starting the day off with a good breakfast is only second to reading the New York Times.

So it’s not surprising that a good number of young people see above-it-all Jon Stewart as a real newsman and can recite liberal talking points ad nauseum. It’s also not surprising to see just how angry and vile they can get when presented with a view they don’t agree with or lack the intellectual ammunition to rebut. They resort to disrespect, profanity and if they weren’t hiding behind online anonymity, perhaps violence.

Young people today act out in ways older Americans never would to adults back in the day. Today’s young people are taught that their political opponents are intellectual inferiors and they do things “smarter”. Today’s young people are taught that all opposition to their superior reasoning is to be shouted down, thus all that “free speech” bullshit they’re taught has qualifications they alone determine.

So let’s not get all shocked when young people commit horrendous acts of violence and destruction. Whether we’re talking about Jared Loughners or the Earth Liberation Front, we’re dealing with people who are acting on what they were taught; not by Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin but by heartless, radical progressive teachers who eagerly offer up sacrificial students who come and go yearly.

The media has never looked at who indoctrinates young people to disrupt political gatherings (on both sides) or infiltrate web forums with the primary intent of insulting those whose views differ with theirs. But take a good look at who shoots up campuses and supermarkets. We’re not talking about older people with subscriptions to Beck and Limbaugh. We’re talking about the youth who are later found to be college educated with the “Communist Manifesto” and “Earth in the Balance” on their bookshelves.

Take a look at the radical professors and see who’s really placing the bulleyes on their opposition.

On Sept. 29, 2008, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, praised House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, D-MA, for his “leadership.” In the next breath, she blamed the sub-prime mortgage meltdown on a supposed lack of Wall Street regulation by right-wing ideologues in the Bush administration. Turns out Pelosi had it exactly wrong. The collapse of government-guaranteed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which helped send the U.S. economy into a nose-dive, was a preventable man-made disaster, according to documents obtained by Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act.

In fact, for at least six years prior, officials at the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) warned key members of Congress – in letters, congressional testimony and email – that post-Enron financial controls at the two mortgage giants were “inadequate.” They also found that neither Fannie nor Freddie were even filing disclosure documents required of all public companies in a timely fashion. Despite FHFA’s multiple alarms, Congress failed to rein in such illegal and reckless behavior. Prominent among Fannie and Freddie’s congressional defenders was Frank, who said on September 10, 2003 that Fannie and Freddie were “not in crisis.”
— Washington Examiner

Thanks for the belated history lesson. As the Democrats, led by Obama and Pelosi, are spending a remedy to the catastrophe they created, the then-dormant media now laments the fact they’ve become irrelevent.

What a difference four years makes.

(CNN) — An evenly divided electorate split sharply, and in some states decisively, on age, gender, religious, racial and ideological lines, according to national exit polls.
— CNN, 11/3/04

In 2004, George W. Bush won 51% of the popular vote yet the electorate was “split sharply”, implying that the American people didn’t want him to do what ever he wanted. According to the left (who declared he wasn’t their president), Bush had no mandate.

Fast forward to November 5th, 2008 and the definition of “mandate”, at least to our progressive wing, changed….

(thinkprogress.org) — John Podesta, President and CEO of the Center for American Progress (currently on leave to head the Obama transition), explained this morning on Fox News Sunday that President-Elect Barack Obama’s victory last week constituted a strong endorsement by the American people of a “progressive philosophy” and has given progressives a “real mandate for change.”
— Think Progress, 11/9/08

Barack Obama won only 52% of the popular vote.

Thus the confusion.

Why was George W. Bush denied the mantle of mandate while Barack Obama was declared his, and only with a one percentage point difference between them?

Can you say delusional wishful thinking made reality?

If anything is going to rile up the right, it is the gloating.

Refresh my memory if I’m forgetting something, but when President Bush was inaugurated in 2001, I don’t remember promos this blatantly triumphalist even on Fox News. It passive-aggressively defies you to disagree with it, as it asserts that this guy who hasn’t even been sworn in yet will undeniably be an inspirational, nay, an historic figure. Even if you didn’t vote for him, you have to admit that Jan. 20 will be a truly amazing day. Right?You have to admit it, right? Well, admit it!

We’re being told to join in the nationwide celebration (like we have a choice), but not all were respectful on past January 20ths….

2005

Tens of thousands protest Bush inauguration in Washington
1/21/05

Tens of thousands of people took to the streets of Washington Thursday to protest the inauguration of George W. Bush for a second term as US president. Many lined the route of the inaugural parade, booing and jeering as Bush’s limousine made its way down Pennsylvania Avenue. “Not our president,” some chanted.

Can anyone out there imagine the high frequency squealings that would be emitted if Republicans protested the Obama inaugural parade, chanting “Not our president”?

Students protest Bush’s inauguration
1/21/05

While coronation festivities were under way in Washington for President Bush Thursday, local residents performed a mock inauguration on a live bush — the plant — in protest. Ducking catcalls and hoots from supporters of President Bush, about 35 students and Athens residents staged a noisy but peaceful “counter inauguration” Thursday afternoon at the Arch.

One sign read, “He ain’t my president. Disappointed? Yes. Defeated? No. Continue to speak out.” The sign was held by 55-year-old Drago Tesamoveich, a resident of Colbert. “People need to continue to speak out to show that the president doesn’t have a mandate,” he said.

Let’s not forget that while Barack Obama’s win was “historic”, a 53% popular vote win isn’t a mandate. Then again, we know how words like “mandate” changes its meaning when interpreted by a victorious or defeated left.

And this isn’t a recent phenomenon.

Thousands protest, hold vigils on inauguration
1/21/05

Thousands of people in dozens of cities across the nation walked out of work and school, held mock coronations, intoned the names of the Iraq war dead and held candlelight vigils to show their disapproval of President Bush as he was sworn in for his second term.

“The administration thinks it’s got a mandate to continue its policies,” said David Williams, a 49-year-old construction company owner from Oakland, Calif., who wore a T-shirt to the San Francisco march with Bush’s picture and the description, “International Terrorist.”

If Republicans were to throw bottles, tomatoes, an egg, and burned an American flag while Obama’s motorcade “crept” by, just what do you think the outrage level on the left would be? This, by the very same now instructing us to be respectful.

2001

Crowds Protest Bush Inauguration
1/21/01

George W. Bush’s motorcade crept through the largest inaugural protests since Richard Nixon on Saturday, enduring thousands of protesters who hurled insults at the newly installed president. Some threw bottles, tomatoes and an egg and one demonstrator burned an American flag atop a lamppost.

Protesters clashed briefly with police clad in riot gear at a few flash points while Bush remained inside his armored stretch car for most of the parade up a soggy, cold Pennsylvania Avenue.

I wonder if all those Obama supporters who “pushed back” during the campaign see just how immature they come off as. They can be as rude as they want to a president they didn’t support, yet got down right ugly when you didn’t support their guy.

Thousands protest Bush’s Inauguration
1/20/01

Demonstrators turned out in droves on Saturday — a miserably gray and drizzly day, with temperatures hovering in the mid-30s — to protest the Inauguration of President George W. Bush, whose election was contested all the way to the Supreme Court. Police would not estimate the size of the crowd, but many thousands of protesters were in evidence.

“The level of people on the streets shows that people are really upset about lack of democratic process,” says Liz Butler of the Justice Action Movement, the umbrella organizing committee responsible for the protest. “They took it to the streets. We saw tens of thousands. We saw far more protesting Bush than supporting him.”

They came out in scores, co-existing on the parade route with supporters of the new president and lining Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol to the White House. Interspersed between Bush-Cheney signs and Texas flags were thousands of protest placards, bearing inscriptions such as “Bush Cheated,” “Hail to the Thief,” “Selected not elected,” “Bushwhacked by the Supremes” and “Golly Jeb, we pulled it off!” There were also plenty of R-rated signs, like “Dick and Bush” and “George Wanker Bush.” One poster included a caricature of a metaphorically toothless Bush in the image of Alfred E. Neuman.

While the liberals gather and celebrate in ways that would send them off with razor blades to bathtubs with warm water had we had won and gloated in this manner, I will sit silently, seethe, and mentally prepare a hit piece for the next Republican who asks us to be tolerant and inclusive.

I will tactfully remind them that our liberals don’t observe the rules they issue for the rest of us to observe.

During the next Republican victory, I will gloat my ass off. I will show these pictures (and a lot more) to remind the lamenting left that we were classy. We were respectful. We toned it down as they asked, and what did we get for it?

You wanna see “gloat”?

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

When a black conservative is nominated for any kind of prominent position, the liberal response is that they are not the “right kind of black.” In other words, they’ve escaped the plantation and aren’t their kind of nigger. In order to place them within that category, people like Gloria Allred call them “Uncle Tom types.”

With that, the nomination of Dr. Condoleeza Rice by President Bush for the position of Secretary of State has elicited the usual response of racist caricature.

Democrats, who make it a point of reminding us how much they love us niggers, have never placed black people in positions of real importance. Sure city mayors here and there, but in previous liberal administrations have made it only as high as Secretary of Commerce and Deputy Attorney General. And when Commerce Secretary Ron Brown was killed in a plane crash while on duty, he wasn’t even given the courtesy of an autopsy, something of a given considering his position. Niggers aren’t worth that kind of attention or expense.

Now available on important publications like the New York Times, liberal cartoonists go where photos cannot.

Please note how the depiction of Dr. Rice is a parrot for a dumb Republican president, complete with the big lips and buckteeth. One can only imagine the screech if a conservative created a portrayal like that of a Democrat black.

Can any of us remember Mr. Oliphant creating a racist caricature of such esteemed dignitaries like Jesse Jackson of Al Sharpton? Where are the racist cartoons of Yassir Arafat, Osama bin Laden, or any of the terrorists that kill civilians as a military tactic? While Al-Jazeera is overplaying the shooting of a supposed unarmed terrorist by a U.S. marine while choosing not to air the execution of CARE President Margaret Hassan by Iraqi militants, where are the cartoons of those animals?

True, Arafat and his ilk was only bent on killing Jews, which is something the heralded United Nations consider a moot point. Hassan is just a woman, so her killers get a pass. But let a conservative black woman turn her back on her designated massah and watch her incur the wrath of the liberal press.

For those of you who missed the reference, Jeff Danziger’s cartoon is a parody of Butterfly McQueen’s famous lines about “birthin’ babies” from “Gone With The Wind.” Note Dr. Rice and the bare feet. Despite her upbringing and making it to highly respectable positions in life, she is reduced to a barefooted, Ebonics-speaking nigger bitch. No mention of her rise despite “adversity.”

Brown Sugar….

Word is, according to certain former Arkansas state troopers, the Clintons used the nigger word fairly recently, so Gary Trudeau’s depiction of a conversation in the White House between President Bush and Dr. Rice is exactly where a liberal would go given the opportunity.

Back to what should be taught in schools….

If not for the Republican Senate in 1964, there would be no Civil Rights Act, thanks to Dixiecrats like J. William Fulbright, Sam Irvin, Lester Maddox, and Albert Gore, Jr. If not for Senate Republicans blacks wouldn’t be allowed to vote, and better yet, if not for a Republican President, blacks might still be slaves if certain Democrats had any say.

So niggers who stray are fair game.

The recent Monday Night Football flack between Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver Terrell Owens and actress Nicollette Sheridan illustrates how liberals believe they have a lock on creating racial shitstorms.

…
In the spot, Owens had no loyalty to his team and was ready to go do whatever was implied by the “cross promotion” with Sheridan, while his team took the field without him.

Despite the shallow apology, there was no wardrobe malfunction here. This was tawdry, unnecessary and the New York Times was okay with it.

So the next time liberals attempt to tell us how to be tolerant, I’m happy to know that in their eyes as a black conservative, I am a nigger and I’ve need to have my mind made right. Good thing for me they can’t take me out back for a whuppin’.

Just put me in one of those housing projects where I belong. Encourage me to have sex and impregnate as many women as possible so the Democrats can assume the role of father and consider my seed their property. Produce more rap videos so people around the world can embrace black people as the thugs and whores the liberals consider us, while white Hollywood liberals can buy homes in Beverly Hills from the cash such trash brings in.

Keep making those comics for the New York Times. That’s keeping it real, because that’s what happens when we make massah mad.