John Holdren, former Assistant to the President for Science and Technology under Obama, has successfully ping-ponged from the faculty lounge/nonprofit world to a presidential administration and back to the faculty lounge so he’s going to remain well fed. His concern for the future of his colleagues’ paychecks is steeped in the promotion of conclusions based on manipulated climate data used to suppress opposing scientific discussion.

One renowned scientist shared with us his candid opinion of Dr. Holdren and his brand of “science”.

This man is the personification of evil from his early days with Ehrlich and the promotion of eugenics, through his vicious attacks on Willie Soon, but especially Sally Baliunas when he was at Harvard to his use of. The White House authority to push false science like the incorrectly named Polar vortex, like it was something new. He is pure socialism from head to toe.
— Timothy Ball, Environmentalist

Bob freelanced as a video cameraman for a few gatherings at the National Science Foundation in Washington, D.C. where nonprofits and colleges made their respective cases to acquire federal funding. The majority of their PowerPoint presentations were pleas to fund projects that saw no clear conclusions to their research, thus the funding required appeared to be open-ended.

We’re not implying that all of the taxpayer funding Holdren is in panic of the scientific community losing isn’t legitimate, but science is supposed to the quest for knowledge, not the suppressing of research that doesn’t reach a political conclusion, and in fact may expose science that’s been used to support the lavish lifestyles of progressive, self-appointed gurus.

A group of executives who want to fight global warming has published a new report calling for countries to spend up to $600 billion a year over the next two decades to boost green energy deployment and energy efficiency equipment. The Energy Transitions Commission’s (ETC) report claims “additional investments of around $300-$600 billion per annum do not pose a major macroeconomic challenge,” which they say will help the world meet the goals laid out in the Paris agreement.

ETC is made up of energy executives, activist leaders and investment bankers, including former Vice President Al Gore, who would no doubt get a piece of the trillions of dollars they are calling for.
— Daily Caller, 4/25/17

We’re not sure if Gore’s involvement with carbon-credit-trader partners Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers is not the money maker it once was (seriously, what liberal really wants to pay for their own carbon footprint), but here we have yet ANOTHER nonprofit with no goal that will ever be met.

Legitimate science will always be funded through the traditional methods, philanthropy, academia, etc.

Scams require emotional fundraising techniques mastered by liberal career mill nonprofits, the entrenched and comfortable within the federal government now see their livelihood threatened because President Trump dares challenge the “settled science” of global cooling-turned-global warming-turned-climate change-turned-carbon crisis which will inevitably morph into something else once CO2 is again proved to be something natural that can’t be demonized for profit.

Be prepared for more hysterics as this is NOT about “science”.

It never really was.

Facebook: March for Science
It is time for scientists, science enthusiasts, and concerned citizens to come together to make ourselves heard! This is a public page for discussion about a march on Washington by scientists and science enthusiasts.

Sorry, this is NOT about the concern of scientists about carbon footprints. This is all about the possibility that scientists who make a very good living on monitoring the climate stand to lose their livelihoods.

About the National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950 “to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense….”

With an annual budget of $7.5 billion (FY 2016), we are the funding source for approximately 24 percent of all federally supported basic research conducted by America’s colleges and universities. In many fields such as mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, NSF is the major source of federal backing.

There have been many opportunities for so-called scientists to march. It appears their sole motivation in 2017 is not the health of the planet, but their wallets.

And if you look at what the activists propose, it’s clear they exempt themselves from their possible environmental impact while denying the world’s poor the right to develop their natural resources so they can enjoy a lifestyle that doesn’t include sickness and early death.

Meteorologists can’t tell us what the weather will be this weekend but we’re all supposed to change our way of life because “scientists” can tell us what the weather will be hundreds of years after they’re dead and can’t be held publicly and/or legally accountable.

As long as these “scientists” can perpetuate the climate change “consensus” lie, they can continue to make their car and mortgage payments, eat very well, and enjoy a relatively calm, federal grant-paid job that doesn’t include an end date.