On December 3-4, you can endure slow-talking Al Gore and his eighth annual 24 Hours of Reality: Protect Our Planet, Protect Ourselves, complete with certified has-beens, never-really-weres and on-the-way-outs like Sting & Shaggy, Moby, Jeff Goldblum & the Mildred Snitzer Orchestra, Bob Weir and Wolf Bros, the Goo Goo Dolls, David Crosby, Jaden Smith, Bill Nye, Téa Leoni, Claire Danes, Mandy Patinkin, and a bunch of sanctimonious bureaucrats lecturing on what YOU should do to “save the planet”… things they exempt themselves of.

or…

You can spend an hour and 15 minutes watching one of all-time best, unapologetic, widely-attacked, yet most informative video productions on the topic; complete with experts; not emotional, funding-dependent academics and activists.

The Great Global Warming Swindle is still one the most controversial documentaries on the topic. Check out as much as you wish of Al Gore’s talk-a-thon and see which position on “climate change” and the dangers of C02 makes more sense to you.

Oh, and while they claim this is all about a “discussion”, Al Gore’s live YouTube stream has “disabled” chats AND comments.

This is no surprise.

See how much concern (or lack thereof) Gore shows for the plight of poor African nations he happily denies the opportunity to develop while his privileged Western neophyte devotees stream his live production on their iPhones.

In listening to the hysterics of the climate change believers, it’s not an acceptance of even the remote possibility that there may be other explanations for the change in the climate. It’s more the arrogant denial that, heaven forbid, there is even the slightest possibility that they may have been suckered and are thus, very wrong.

Senator: Use RICO Laws to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
Should Climate Change Deniers Be Prosecuted?
AG Lynch Looks Into Prosecuting ‘Climate Change Deniers’
Bill Nye is open to criminal charges and jail time for climate change dissenters
California Senate sidelines bill to prosecute climate change skeptics
Calls to punish skeptics rise with links to climate change, hurricanes

Let’s not forget, “climate change” was instituted in the 90’s after “global warming” replaced “global cooling” in the 80’s since the planet defiantly stopped burning up as the activists declared it would. “Climate change” is a great all-encompassing, easy-to-recite term since the weather always… changes.

We all know that throwing political opposition in jail is a tried-and-true tactic used by socialists, and that’s far preferable and easier to actually having to be knowledgeable on the topic at hand.

Don’t you wish Al Gore would be selected to participate in a debate so the easily-duped could see just how over-his-head he is and how much he really never knew?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is in the early stages of launching a debate about climate change that could air on television – challenging scientists to prove the widespread view that global warming is a serious threat, the head of the agency said.
— Reuters, 7/11/17

The left has whipped the emotional into a fact-challenged, almost religious frenzy over the looming, apocalyptic “climate change” narrative, despite the fact that almost 97% (sorry, had to make a dig on that often-repeated falsehood) of their dire predictions have come and gone and we’re all still here.

It doesn’t matter what I believe. It only matters what I can prove.
— LTJG Daniel Kaffee, “A Few Good Men”

Sad how liberals find truth within their world of make-believe and fall for the fear even though they will probably never know if that doom-and-gloom was warranted.

You and I are not going to be around in 2100 to see if any of these predictions about the future have come true.
— Manhattan Contrarian, 1/5/18

How convenient.

You have to admit, the climate change topic continues to bring out the stupid in many.

And the intentionally deceptive in others….

This topic has also shown just how much those who claim to be “for the planet” care so little about people, especially people of color.

For those of you who have the time, check out the awesome presentation given by Lord Christopher Monckton, given to anyone with an honest desire for an alternative position on the climate change topic to that of meteorological expert Al Gore.

Unfortunately, the following could be considered a potential trailer for a political comedy.

It will be interesting to see which television channels and/or networks pass on the opportunity to air this debate and the pre and post debate programming that will be used as disclaimers to protect the panicked, lying warmers and their sugar daddies.

Facebook: March for Science
It is time for scientists, science enthusiasts, and concerned citizens to come together to make ourselves heard! This is a public page for discussion about a march on Washington by scientists and science enthusiasts.

Sorry, this is NOT about the concern of scientists about carbon footprints. This is all about the possibility that scientists who make a very good living on monitoring the climate stand to lose their livelihoods.

About the National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950 “to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense….”

With an annual budget of $7.5 billion (FY 2016), we are the funding source for approximately 24 percent of all federally supported basic research conducted by America’s colleges and universities. In many fields such as mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, NSF is the major source of federal backing.

There have been many opportunities for so-called scientists to march. It appears their sole motivation in 2017 is not the health of the planet, but their wallets.

And if you look at what the activists propose, it’s clear they exempt themselves from their possible environmental impact while denying the world’s poor the right to develop their natural resources so they can enjoy a lifestyle that doesn’t include sickness and early death.

Meteorologists can’t tell us what the weather will be this weekend but we’re all supposed to change our way of life because “scientists” can tell us what the weather will be hundreds of years after they’re dead and can’t be held publicly and/or legally accountable.

As long as these “scientists” can perpetuate the climate change “consensus” lie, they can continue to make their car and mortgage payments, eat very well, and enjoy a relatively calm, federal grant-paid job that doesn’t include an end date.