Why has the Democrat-media and their left been on the offensive#Resistance against Donald Trump ever since he won the Republican nomination, the presidency and ever since? Yes, it’s because they can’t accept the fact someone they didn’t authorize won the hearts and minds of Americans they failed to dissuade.
When it comes to Democrats, “civility” has conditions and a time limit.
You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for. I believe if we are fortunate enough to take back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.
— Hillary Clinton, 10/9/18
Well, not even 24 hours since the Democrats got the word they’d retaken the House, MoveOn is taking to the streets AGAIN!
Here’s the information for that event you signed up for—help spread the word by sharing your event with your friends and family.
Event: Nobody is Above the Law Rally
Your attendee tool page: https://act.moveon.org/event/
**NOTE ON TIMING AND WHAT TO EXPECT** Please check the time and date on the event page. However, since many of these events were planned months ago, it’s possible details may shift (if the date seems way off, that’s just a glitch—the events are tomorrow, Thursday, November 8—most of them at 5 p.m. local time). You can still head to the location listed at 5 p.m. local time on Thursday November 8, but note that in some cases a host may not be present. You can still show up with signs, peacefully assemble, and send a clear message to politicians and the media that nobody is above the law! You can also contact the hosts of your event through the event page if you have any questions.
Thanks for all you do.
–David and the whole Nobody Is Above The Law team
— MoveOn/NexGen email, 11/7/18
It must be nice to have supporters who are still such 2016 sore losers that the “Russian collusion” distraction-lie still lives large in their skinny brains.
We’ll see how much disruption and intimidation the Democrat “civility” brings nationally Thursday night.
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson is the latest target of progressive “civility”.
A group of protesters sieged the home of Fox News host Tucker Carlson and his family on Wednesday night, ringing his doorbell and chanting threatening messages. A YouTube video of the event which originated on now-suspended Twitter page “Smash Racism DC,” is poorly lit, but shows a lead protester calling Carlson a racist and a fascist before breaking into threatening chants.
Carlson later told Fox News that his wife was at home with his four children at the time, but he missed it as he was at Fox News’ studios in Washington preparing his show. Fox News said that activists rang Carlson’s doorbell and broke his oak door. Carlson also alleges one protester was caught on security video mentioning a pipe bomb, Fox News said.
— AOL, 11/8/18
One can only imagine what they’d be doing had they lost the House.
If you didn’t think the so-called #DeepState isn’t scared shitless about the possibility that President Trump may soon declassify all documents relating to the Russian collusion ruse, remember: only they are allowed to screw people’s lives and even send anyone they want to prison. It’s not supposed to happen to THEM and now that it’s a distinct possibility, they are fighting back to save their arrogant, fat and comfortable asses.
In court filings last week the Department of Justice deployed what could be the nuclear option in its latest effort to prevent President Trump from declassifying information regarding FISA warrants used to spy on his campaign aide Carter Page: It is claiming that such a move would interfere with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
This is the first time the DOJ has explicitly made this argument implying personal peril for the president, since interference could open Trump to charges of obstruction of justice. Until now, the department has argued that declassifying the documents threatened national security.
In the 178-page court document, DOJ officials said they had “determined that disclosure of redacted information in the Carter Page FISA documents could reasonably be expected to interfere with the pending investigation into Russian election interference.”
That rationale has heightened suspicions among congressional investigators that the special counsel is being used to prevent the disclosure of possible FBI abuses and crimes committed during the Russia probe.
“The obstruction trap was built into the special counsel,” a congressional investigator told RCI, speaking, like the two other sources in this article, only on condition of anonymity. “If Trump fires Mueller, or Rosenstein, or declassifies documents [embarrassing to the FBI] it’s likely to bring an obstruction charge.”
And that would mean double jeopardy for Trump. “Obstruction is the instrument the Democrats are likely to use to impeach Trump if they win the House,” said the congressional source.
— Real Clear Investigation, 10/26/18
Now you can understand why the 2018 midterm elections are so important, especially to the left.
A lot of people feel the way you do, Senator, that words matter. Why don’t a group of you all get together and just confront him and say, you know, “Mr. President, this is not helping. You’ve got to stop it”? So many people come on this program and say what you’re saying, “This is wrong, this is bad. What are we going to do?” It’s very tit for tat. But I know there are people that feel, a lot of people that feel the way you do in very powerful positions. Why don’t a group of you just confront him and just say stop it?
— CBS This Morning co-host Gayle King to Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), 10/26/18
It looks like the message has been sent again because President Trump hasn’t gone away, despite earlier warnings.
“They have six ways from Sunday to get back” at the President of the United States… wow.
So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this.
— Senator Chuck Schumer, Rachel Maddow Show, 1/3/17
It’s not about who the people want to represent them but about saving those within the federal government from the peril they created for themselves and a media so willing to collude with them to remove a president they didn’t authorize.
It’s one thing for the citizens who are in rampant #Resist mode, who believe and act on anything consumed on CNN, MSNBC, NPR or the myriad of so-called professional and social media and liberal dot orgs who depend on a vibrant opposition. But when those at the highest level of the federal government; those with access to proof that something didn’t happen but are proceeding like it did should be of great concern because this kind of tactic can be used against any one of us, any time.
We had the honor of spending some time with former National Security Agency Technical Director Bill Binney a few months ago and hopefully we can get him on video soon to address Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s charges against “Russian officials”. Binney considers Edward Snowden a patriot for alerting the American people that the NSA is actively collecting data on everyone. Maybe even 33,000 “deleted” emails…?
The beauty of this latest chapter is the perpetuation of the 24-7 cable news cycle on the whole Russia collusion thing (which is intended as red meat for the base prior to the 2018 midterms) is it’s a narrative that can last as long as Democrats want. No Russian will EVER see the inside of a United States courtroom to challenge the Rosenstein-special counsel charges, which could also open the special counsel’s office to again having to present their evidence that Russia hacked the 2018 election; something the Mueller team is resisting to produce… because after $17+ million there’s still no there there because there never was.
Russian Uranium One-Clinton Foundation collusion, notwithstanding.
If the media is as independent as they demand we believe, why is it they all tend to repeat the same word and/or narrative regardless if it’s accurate or not.
NY Times: Days Before Firing, Comey Asked for More Resources for Russia Inquiry
CNN: Sources: James Comey sought more resources for Russia investigation
Politico: Sources: Comey told lawmakers he wanted more resources for Russia probe
Washington Post: Furor over Comey firing grows with news that he sought resources for Russia investigation before his dismissal
The Hill: Comey sought more resources for Russia probe before firing: reports
ABC News: Comey asked for more money, staffing for Russia investigation days before firing
Reuters: Comey had pushed for more resources for Russia probe before being fired by Trump: source
Voice of America: Congressional Officials: Comey Sought More Resources for Russia Probe Before Firing
NBC News: Comey Had Asked for More Money for FBI’s Russia Investigation
Of course, the names of the “congressional officials”, the “sources”, or “source” being not named is a red herring. Just take the media’s word for it and even though the Department of Justice denies that more “resources” were requested and Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the Senate Intelligence Committee that they don’t need additional resources to carry out the media’s Russia-stole-the-election-from-Hillary perpetual bludgeon, the “resources” repetition continues.
Hillary Clinton would be the 45th president today had it not been for the Russians working behind the scenes to get Donald Trump elected. President Trump is trying to squeeze off the “resources” needed by investigators to chop down the investigation into Russian meddling of our sacred; an investigation that’s been going on for many months with no evidence to prove anything. Yes, we got it.
However, there is one sticky inconvenience when it comes to the power of the president to fire an FBI director without consulting and acquiring the approval of the House, Senate, or the media.
It’s called, “the law”.
It is sometimes assumed that the President can oust an FBI director only “for cause” – that is, for some misconduct in office. But, as a Congressional Research Service study of the director’s office pointed out two years ago, “there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI director.”
— Constitution Daily, 8/31/16
We’re again supposed to take the word (“resources”) of a media that consistently violates journalistic ethics on the public sharing of sentiments from anonymous sources whose information can’t be verified, but as long as the media’s desired narrative is served, that’s all that we need to know.