Why has the Democrat-media and their left been on the offensive#Resistance against Donald Trump ever since he won the Republican nomination, the presidency and ever since? Yes, it’s because they can’t accept the fact someone they didn’t authorize won the hearts and minds of Americans they failed to dissuade.
Not even 48 hours after Democrats retook the House of Representatives, MoveOn liberals took to the streets on the United States to protest the resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions (who they suddenly see value in?) and his interim replacement, Matthew Whitaker.
Hundreds of Mueller protection protests have been organized nationwide to push back against Donald Trump’s recent authoritarian moves and assert: Nobody is above the law.
— MoveOn Facebook video, 11/8/17
The danger is that Sessions’ resignation could pave the way to firing special counsel Robert Mueller, who’s leading the Russia investigation. This is how it works: AG Sessions should have overseen the Mueller investigation, but since he recused himself, the investigation went to deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. That’s already changing – the new AG will take over the Mueller investigation and thus, have the power to fire Mueller. Firing Mueller for anything other than wrongdoing would be illegal – but Trump seems to have no regard for the law.
— ACLU petition, 11/8/18
Despite not having the power to do so, Democrats have deemed themselves the only ones to select the nest United States Attorney General; NOT the President of the United States.
What too many ACLU and MoveOn’s supporters don’t realize is that they’re being used to cover up the many abuses by pro-Hillary personnel in the DOJ and FBI who did everything they could to thwart the election of Donald Trump and disrupt his transition and presidency. Once the truth of the failed Democrat coup is finally revealed to the American people, all hell will break loose and no taking to the streets will undo the damage they attempted.
Let’s hope no one ever accuses New York Congressman Jerrold Nadler of rape. Even if he didn’t do it, was investigated and was cleared, accuser allegations could not be corroborated, accusers recant their accusations, there will still be someone who want to further ruin his career if not see him behind bars.
Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., revealed plans for House Democrats to investigate and impeach Justice Brett Kavanaugh for alleged perjury.
“We’ve got to figure out what we’re doing,” he explained in a phone call with a friend.
That’s a good start.
Nadler was headed to DC for a two-day planning session with his staff and Judiciary Committee staff and discussed two routes for investigating new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. The first is to go after the FBI for how they handled the investigation into unsubstantiated claims he sexually assaulted women. “They didn’t even do a half-ass job,” he said. “They didn’t interview 30 witnesses who said ‘Interview me! I’ve got a lot to say!‘” he said, while mimicking people waving their hands to be called on.
The FBI interviewed over 40 who had a lot to say however they didn’t verify anything related to any sexual impropriety by Brett Kavanaugh. They probably could’ve found others that may have a lot to say if that perjury thing wasn’t involved.
His other plan is to go after Kavanaugh because “there’s a real indication that Kavanaugh committed perjury.” He claimed that The Atlantic published an article about the allegations of a third woman. Then he claimed that when Kavanaugh was “asked at a committee hearing under oath when he first heard of the subject, he said, ‘When I’d heard of the Atlantic article.’ But there is an email chain apparently dating from well before that from him about ‘How can we deal with this?‘” Nadler told the caller.
The “journalism” of The Atlantic!
Make that the basis at your own peril, Congressman.
Nadler was apparently discussing a slightly different claim, since debunked, which is that Kavanaugh perjured himself when he denied hearing of The New Yorker’s disputed allegation involving Deborah Ramirez until the story came out. Considering that The New Yorker included a denial from Kavanaugh in its own controversial story, and was asking him about it right before publication, and he acknowledged all that in his Senate testimony, it’s unclear how fruitful such a perjury claim would be.
When the caller objected to the plan, Nadler pushed back, “That’s not technical, that’s real.” He conceded that maybe it was not a great plan, since even if Kavanaugh could be removed, it might not result in the political results desired.
As most of us have known, the Kavanaugh circus was never about truth but a “political result”.
“The worst-case scenario — or best case depending on your point of view — you prove he committed perjury, about a terrible subject and the Judicial Conference recommends you impeach him. So the president appoints someone just as bad.“
— Mollie Hemingway, 11/7/18
The left’s mantras are #BelieveSurvivors because women NEVER LIE, especially about rape.
“That it happened or not, I have no idea,” Cristina King Miranda told NPR’s Nina Totenberg. “I can’t say that it did or didn’t.” That’s different from what Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Twitter post that stated definitively, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”
— NPR, 9/20/18
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, cited “contradictions” between what Michael Avenatti’s client, Julie Swetnick, originally told the Judiciary Committee about Brett Kavanaugh in an affidavit in late September, and what she said about the then-Supreme Court nominee days later in an interview with NBC News.
“Swetnick made her allegations in a sworn statement to the committee on September 26. In an October 1 interview with NBC News, however, Swetnick specifically and explicitly back-tracked or contradicted key parts of her sworn statement on these and other allegations,” the Judiciary Committee said in a statement.
— CNBC, 10/25/18
Sen. Chuck Grassley asked the federal authorities on Friday to investigate another person he says made false claims against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Grassley, in a letter to the Department of Justice and FBI, said a woman by the name of Judy Munro-Leighton took responsibility for authoring an anonymous letter that made allegations that Kavanaugh and a friend raped her. After she was tracked down and interviewed by Senate investigators, the woman recanted and said she was not, in fact. the author and had never met Kavanaugh.
— USA Today, 11/2/18
After an extensive investigation that included the thorough review of all potentially credible evidence submitted and interviews of more than 40 individuals with information relating to the allegations, including classmates and friends of all those involved, Committee investigators found no witness who could provide any verifiable evidence to support any of the allegations brought against Justice Kavanaugh.
— Senate Judiciary Committee Report, 11/2/18
There was a very biased culture when it comes to the investigations of the 2016 Donald J. Trump campaign and so-called “Russian collusion”: political bias within the Federal Bureau of Investigation as well as those conducting the special counsel investigation. It was obviously very embarrassing to the FBI and the director offered the following assurances (in the aftermath of the Inspector General report) to the American people that the agency will make every attempt to conduct further business in a professional, non-biased manner… an assurance one would think never had to be made.
Because change starts at the top—including right here with me—we’re going to begin by requiring all our senior executives, from around the world, to convene for in-depth training on the lessons we should learn from today’s report. Then we’re going to train every single FBI employee—new hires and veterans alike—on what went wrong, so those mistakes will never be repeated.
We’re going to make sure we have the policies, procedures, and training needed for everyone to understand and remember what’s expected of us.
That includes: Drilling home the importance of objectivity—and of avoiding even the appearance of personal conflicts or political bias in our work.
— Christopher Wray, FBI Director, 6/14/18
We’ve heard this all before. A government agency and/or employee runs afoul of the rules and we’re all assured that agency or person receives the appropriate retraining. We decided to inquire as to what kind of in-depth training would be conducted, WHO would be composing the training syllabus and WHO would be presenting the anti-bias training to employees. We thought this a reasonable request seeing how the American people would not only be affected by those “trained” agents but taxpayers would also be paying for the physical materials and paying those who’ll be administering the “training” to FBI personnel around the world.
We sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI and received the following response….
So, the same FBI that had agents sending highly-biased text messages between them (that we only found out about because of an internal investigation) is now telling us their remedies won’t be made public in the interest of “national defense or foreign policy”?
The following is the FBI’s attached reasoning and justification.
We won’t know what the FBI will be teaching their senior executives down through the ranks, on foreign soil and domestically. We won’t know WHO will be doing the teaching of this anti-biased training… any number of our favorite social justice activists, a contractor from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the ACLU, etc.?
The American people will just have to take their word for it… again.
Some of you have heard the latest when it comes to doing stupid things like making audible jokes at Los Angeles International Airport. But a pattern is informally emerging.
If you’re a professional athlete, don’t do it….
Green Bay Packers wide receiver Trevor Davis was arrested at LAX on Sunday morning after cops say he joked about smuggling a bomb into the airport, TMZ Sports has learned. Law enforcement sources tell us the 24-year-old — a 5th round draft pick out of Cal in 2016 — was at the Hawaiian Airlines ticket counter with a female companion to check into a flight when the attendant asked the usual security questions about their luggage.
Instead of playing it straight — we’re told Davis turned to the other woman and said, “Did you remember to pack the explosives?” She apparently said, “No” and tried to get him to stop. He then said, “Just kidding” — but it was too late.
— TMZ Sports, 4/9/18
And this is not the first time an athlete was arrested for an ill-timed comment at LAX.
San Francisco 49ers linebacker Aldon Smith was arrested Sunday at Los Angeles International Airport after authorities said he became belligerent during a security screening and threatened that he had a bomb.
The 24-year-old player was randomly selected for a secondary screening at Terminal 1 and became uncooperative during the process, airport police Sgt. Karla Ortiz said. She said he told a TSA agent that he had a bomb before walking to the gate. When airport police officers caught up with him, Ortiz said Smith became uncooperative and was taken into custody.
— Hollywood Reporter, 4/14/14
To date, the amount of black Americans attempting or carrying out an explosive attack on an airline is relatively small, if at all. However the same can’t be said about muslims, yet they can apparently make verbal threats at Los Angeles International Airport and only be called on it once those threats become very public.
Muslim Woman Makes Terror Threats at LA Airport
One day after the Islamic terrorist attack in Orlando, a Muslim woman showed up at the Los Angeles International Airport, making terror threats. The news media was silent. Journalist and cameraman Tony Vera captured police questioning a Muslim woman at the airport and searching her luggage, but finding nothing wrong, they released her and let her continue on inside the airport.
Vera stopped her as she walked past him, and that’s when she let lose again, with verbal terrorist threats against America. “Fuck America,” the woman said. “I will make sure we bomb America. You wait and see!” She ranted on for several minutes, and eventually police arrested her again at the ticket counter, this time for real.
According to Dennis Michael Lynch, the woman made comments provocative enough for the LAX police and LAPD call the FBI, all of whom appear to have decided those comments did not warrant an arrest until she took it inside. Certainly the comments of Trevor Davis and Alton Smith were no way in the same league as “Fuck America. I will make sure we bomb America. You wait and see.” One was a bad joke and the other was the retort of a spoiled athlete who though he was better than the travelling public.
So, we’re at a place where a muslim woman can say things that can earn her the attention of local and federal law enforcement, be allowed to walk away and only be arrested when she dares do it again? Trevor Davis and Alton Smith seemed to have received a whole lot less slack than the muslim woman which comes back to what we’ve been saying for years: muslims demand equal treatment.
I have am going to have a safe life but I’m going to make sure none of you will have a safe sleep. Boom! Wait and see for yourself. Do you know who Allah is? Fuck America. I will make sure we bomb America. First of all there is lesbian and gay this is not allowed. Wait and see! We will bomb the country. You have no idea what’s happening. That’s what we do, we bomb people. Who cares what’s right or what’s not, it is (god’s will).”
— UK Sun, 10/21/16
They really demand special treatment and they appear to be getting it.
In an attempt to jump in on the liberal outrage over the Andrew McCabe firing, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell invited Wisconsin Democrat Congressman Mark Pocan on her show to commiserate over what they universally believe was a grave injustice to a career federal employee.
However, Mitchell engaged the blatant inciting of news instead of simply reporting it.
Over the weekend, she sent out a Tweet (as a “McCabe supporter”). We’re not sure if she subconsciously believes no one reads her Tweets, but she gave the impression that the idea of anyone giving McCabe a federal job so his pension benefits would remain intact was a good one.
The problem is, not everyone’s initial instinct is to lie and Congressman Pocan appropriately gave credit where credit was due….
BTW — The liberal Democrat and/or media lament that McCabe “lost his pension” is yet another attempt to mislead the American people.
In all of the discussion of the firing of Andrew McCabe, various news outlets focused his “loss” of his pension as opposed to the fact that career officials called for his firing for serious misconduct. The firing denied McCabe early pension recovery at age 50 of roughly $60,000 a year. However, that only means that he will receive the pension like other federal officials when he reached the federal retirement age. He is entitled to recover at the standard period between 57 and age 62.
— Jonathan Turley, George Washington University law professor, 3/19/18
Remember this as the widely-distributed and repeated lies continue forward.
With the unfortunate aftermath of the church shooting in Texas, the liberal left and their media has yet again taken this as a “crisis” not wasted.
Texas church mass shooting leads to calls for prayer — and gun control
It’s Not Too Soon to Debate Gun Control
Lax Texas Gun Laws, the NRA and Another Horrendous Deadly Mass Shooting
Murphy: ‘No one is safe’ until Congress acts on gun violence
While it literally took minutes for the left to politicize the Sutherland Springs shooting, they were also the first to demand we NOT publicize the New York City truck attack due to the profile of the perpetrator.
There was a particular posting from October 4th that came across the radar that peaked attention because despite the carnage that happens daily in Democrat, gun-controlled meccas like Chicago (which mainly involves politically insignificant black people), the BBC highlighted the fact that most “mass” shootings are mostly carried out by “white” men.
BTW — As of October 31, there were 569 deaths in Chicago; a death toll mostly involving black-on-black violence Democrats and their media ignore, as the symptoms leading to inner city crime is intentional neglect that can be used for vapid reelection themes and liberal nonprofit and government services growth.
Since 9/11, approximately 110 people have been killed and 495 wounded in the United States by a group not-white and suspiciously omitted by the BCC list with numbers said to be obtained by the FBI and Mother Jones.
Anyone want to take a guess at what that group is?
Muslims have carried out horrific attacks all over the world in concert venues, restaurants, media offices, on the streets, and we NEVER hear Democrats call them out, demanding gun, knife, hatchet, machete, or vehicle control. Instead, attacks are lamented, reasons are found to excuse the motives of the attacker, and they lay blame at anything else, like online recruitment, instead of religion-fueled murderous hate.
Liberal Democrats want to take away the guns of law-abiding Americans and veterans (with PTSD for starters), highlighting the race and possible political beliefs of the shooter (providing he isn’t a Bernie supporter) is fair game, but whenever a Muslim commits mass carnage, Americans are reminded who the real victims are….
While “backlash” against Muslims after an attack is something yet to be enumerated, aside from the hysterics coming from Council on American-Islamic Relations or the Southern Poverty Law Center, the major contribution of Muslims on our society since our 9/11 awareness has been increased screening inconvenience at airports, ugly barriers on streets and on sidewalks, not to mention the “special treatment” instead of the equal treatment they demand.
The assertion that gun violence is a “white male” problem is misleading at best, a blatant political lie at worst. Deliberately omitting the statistics of those suffering from gun violence in poor Democrat districts as well as those they consider a protected minority is what we’ve unfortunately come to expect from the media, both in the United States and abroad.
We posted the above video directly to our site as any further “negative” mention regarding Muslims would probably result in YouTube’s removal of our channel.
It all started with Hillary’s illegal server and an investigation was launched prior to her presidential campaign announcement. Later, when FBI Director James Comey stated during a press conference she was reckless in her handling of classified materials but refused to indict her, Democrats sung his praise in unison. But in days before the election when he revealed that classified documents were found on Hillary-accessory Huma Abedin’s husband Anthony Weiner’s laptop mere days before the election, Democrats wanted Comey’s head on a platter.
Mother Jones: Fuck You, James Comey
Washington Post: James Comey is damaging our democracy
Occupy Democrats: Calls For FBI Director James Comey To Resign Spread Across The U.S.
Western Journalism: Obama Expected To Fire FBI Director Once The Election Is Over
Daily Mail: Senior adviser Jarrett has convinced President Obama to FIRE FBI director Comey after election
Newsweek: FBI Director James Comey Is Unfit for Public Service
HuffPo: Dozens Of Former Federal Prosecutors Sign Open Letter Criticizing James Comey
PoliticusUSA: Call On President Obama to Terminate F.B.I. Director Comey on November 9
The Hill: Time to fire FBI Director James Comey
The Nation: James Comey’s Actions Place Him in the Worst Traditions of J. Edgar Hoover
Daily Kos: Why does James Comey still have a job?
Bloomberg: Schumer Says He Lost Confidence in FBI’s Comey Over E-Mail Probe
Now that President Trump has fired Comey, the same Democrats see this as a cover-up on their Russia-stole-the-election whine that’s backed up by zero evidence after months of investigation.
Can we once again call Democrats and their media on their tired old traits of ignorant, vindictive, shortsighted, emotionally irrational, political hypocrisy?
Yes, we can!
Bottom line: the FBI Director was put in the worst possible position by the many deliberate, reckless, illegal (and possibly treasonous) actions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Had he informed the people of the basis of his investigation before the election, he’d be accused of influencing in favor of Donald J. Trump. Had he remained silent until after the election and then revealed the contents of his investigation should Hillary have won, he’d be accused of withholding information that prevented the people from making an informed, possibly election-swinging decision. Granted, Comey handled it questionably, but leaving everything to Barack Obama and Loretta “tarmac” Lynch would have been problematic as well.
So, while the media screams “Saturday night massacre” in unison and now portray James Comey a victim of a “Nixonian” conspiracy, remember who set all of this intrigue in motion in the first place: Hillary Clinton and her cheerleading media, NOT Donald Trump.
After five-plus hours in front of the House Select Intelligence Committee, FBI Director James Comey and NSA Director Admiral Michael Rogers basically confirmed Russian president Vladimir Putin didn’t like Hillary Clinton (like he’s special), they knew of no wiretapping of the Trump Tower (which doesn’t mean it didn’t happen), and after five months there was still no proof of an effect of Russian “meddling” in our 2016 presidential election.
What we do know is that alphabet agencies leaked classified information about an American citizen under possibly illegal surveillance to the many media entities which published the name of that citizen and the FBI director acknowledged that persons committed a felony, but trust him that an investigation that he can’t talk about is happening, although he can’t confirm it.
Of course, we’ll be assured our investigation and intelligence agencies are not politicized, but money talks.
Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.
— The Hill, 10/26/16
Leaks meant to disrupt the Trump agenda from government employees who’ve chosen a political side instead of doing their job.
Nah, nothing to see here.
The Independent has learned that US Senator John McCain spoke to Sir Andrew Wood, who served in Moscow as the UK’s head of mission for five years, about claims that the US President-elect was susceptible to blackmail over alleged sexual activity and that his team had colluded with Moscow during the presidential election campaign.
The meeting took place at an international security conference in Halifax, Canada, last November, after Mr Trump’s victory. Mr McCain, the chair of the Senate armed forces committee, was so concerned by what he had heard that he personally met James Comey, the director of the FBI, after returning from the Canadian conference, and passed on the information. It formed part of a report about Russian interference in the US presidential election process which was presented to Barack Obama and Mr Trump by the intelligence agencies last week.
— The Independent (UK), 1/12/17
So immediately after the election, Senator John McCain took a little trip north to Halifax and kinda’ sided with those not happy about the election of Donald Trump.
So much for the protocol of not bad-mouthing our nation outside of our borders.
Some Republican legislators attending seemed to support Trump, yet simultaneously raise opposition to some of his specific policy ideas.
“I believe there’s every opportunity for us to work together,” said Sen. John McCain, the chairperson of the armed services committee, during an interview with one of the moderators. Yet, he also differed with the president-elect’s campaign positions on everything from reworking the North American Free Trade Agreement to cosying up with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Syria.
— The Star (CA), 11/19/16
Not that we’re wandering into the weeds, but the Halifax International Security Forum is yet another Washington, D.C. nonprofit (“Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy”) that holds their annual conference in another country….
and their sources of funding are apparently nobody’s damn business.
While John McCain was not the only United States politician participating, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to ask why he was on foreign soil without a whole lot of disclosure to the American taxpayers who probably footed some of his travel expenses, spoke out against the Republican President-Elect, and just happened to meet up with a foreign agent who gave him political dirt that he ended up handing over to the FBI Director.
This is not as simple as McCain wants us to believe, but like most things on Capitol Hill, it’s all coming out in drips.