Why has the Democrat-media and their left been on the offensive#Resistance against Donald Trump ever since he won the Republican nomination, the presidency and ever since? Yes, it’s because they can’t accept the fact someone they didn’t authorize won the hearts and minds of Americans they failed to dissuade.
Call it yet the latest example of the taxpayer-funded steamroller, called our Just Us Department: a steamroller that can ruin lives during investigations that increase federal prosecutor profiles on their way up the chain. We’re witnessing in real time an underbelly of our government that would’ve been sight unseen had Hillary Clinton won the presidency: the push to enforce the unregistered foreign agent law that many well-connected are even bothered with.
Not even 48 hours after Democrats retook the House of Representatives, MoveOn liberals took to the streets on the United States to protest the resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions (who they suddenly see value in?) and his interim replacement, Matthew Whitaker.
Hundreds of Mueller protection protests have been organized nationwide to push back against Donald Trump’s recent authoritarian moves and assert: Nobody is above the law.
— MoveOn Facebook video, 11/8/17
The danger is that Sessions’ resignation could pave the way to firing special counsel Robert Mueller, who’s leading the Russia investigation. This is how it works: AG Sessions should have overseen the Mueller investigation, but since he recused himself, the investigation went to deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. That’s already changing – the new AG will take over the Mueller investigation and thus, have the power to fire Mueller. Firing Mueller for anything other than wrongdoing would be illegal – but Trump seems to have no regard for the law.
— ACLU petition, 11/8/18
Despite not having the power to do so, Democrats have deemed themselves the only ones to select the nest United States Attorney General; NOT the President of the United States.
What too many ACLU and MoveOn’s supporters don’t realize is that they’re being used to cover up the many abuses by pro-Hillary personnel in the DOJ and FBI who did everything they could to thwart the election of Donald Trump and disrupt his transition and presidency. Once the truth of the failed Democrat coup is finally revealed to the American people, all hell will break loose and no taking to the streets will undo the damage they attempted.
Let’s hope no one ever accuses New York Congressman Jerrold Nadler of rape. Even if he didn’t do it, was investigated and was cleared, accuser allegations could not be corroborated, accusers recant their accusations, there will still be someone who want to further ruin his career if not see him behind bars.
Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., revealed plans for House Democrats to investigate and impeach Justice Brett Kavanaugh for alleged perjury.
“We’ve got to figure out what we’re doing,” he explained in a phone call with a friend.
That’s a good start.
Nadler was headed to DC for a two-day planning session with his staff and Judiciary Committee staff and discussed two routes for investigating new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. The first is to go after the FBI for how they handled the investigation into unsubstantiated claims he sexually assaulted women. “They didn’t even do a half-ass job,” he said. “They didn’t interview 30 witnesses who said ‘Interview me! I’ve got a lot to say!‘” he said, while mimicking people waving their hands to be called on.
The FBI interviewed over 40 who had a lot to say however they didn’t verify anything related to any sexual impropriety by Brett Kavanaugh. They probably could’ve found others that may have a lot to say if that perjury thing wasn’t involved.
His other plan is to go after Kavanaugh because “there’s a real indication that Kavanaugh committed perjury.” He claimed that The Atlantic published an article about the allegations of a third woman. Then he claimed that when Kavanaugh was “asked at a committee hearing under oath when he first heard of the subject, he said, ‘When I’d heard of the Atlantic article.’ But there is an email chain apparently dating from well before that from him about ‘How can we deal with this?‘” Nadler told the caller.
The “journalism” of The Atlantic!
Make that the basis at your own peril, Congressman.
Nadler was apparently discussing a slightly different claim, since debunked, which is that Kavanaugh perjured himself when he denied hearing of The New Yorker’s disputed allegation involving Deborah Ramirez until the story came out. Considering that The New Yorker included a denial from Kavanaugh in its own controversial story, and was asking him about it right before publication, and he acknowledged all that in his Senate testimony, it’s unclear how fruitful such a perjury claim would be.
When the caller objected to the plan, Nadler pushed back, “That’s not technical, that’s real.” He conceded that maybe it was not a great plan, since even if Kavanaugh could be removed, it might not result in the political results desired.
As most of us have known, the Kavanaugh circus was never about truth but a “political result”.
“The worst-case scenario — or best case depending on your point of view — you prove he committed perjury, about a terrible subject and the Judicial Conference recommends you impeach him. So the president appoints someone just as bad.“
— Mollie Hemingway, 11/7/18
The left’s mantras are #BelieveSurvivors because women NEVER LIE, especially about rape.
“That it happened or not, I have no idea,” Cristina King Miranda told NPR’s Nina Totenberg. “I can’t say that it did or didn’t.” That’s different from what Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Twitter post that stated definitively, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”
— NPR, 9/20/18
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, cited “contradictions” between what Michael Avenatti’s client, Julie Swetnick, originally told the Judiciary Committee about Brett Kavanaugh in an affidavit in late September, and what she said about the then-Supreme Court nominee days later in an interview with NBC News.
“Swetnick made her allegations in a sworn statement to the committee on September 26. In an October 1 interview with NBC News, however, Swetnick specifically and explicitly back-tracked or contradicted key parts of her sworn statement on these and other allegations,” the Judiciary Committee said in a statement.
— CNBC, 10/25/18
Sen. Chuck Grassley asked the federal authorities on Friday to investigate another person he says made false claims against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Grassley, in a letter to the Department of Justice and FBI, said a woman by the name of Judy Munro-Leighton took responsibility for authoring an anonymous letter that made allegations that Kavanaugh and a friend raped her. After she was tracked down and interviewed by Senate investigators, the woman recanted and said she was not, in fact. the author and had never met Kavanaugh.
— USA Today, 11/2/18
After an extensive investigation that included the thorough review of all potentially credible evidence submitted and interviews of more than 40 individuals with information relating to the allegations, including classmates and friends of all those involved, Committee investigators found no witness who could provide any verifiable evidence to support any of the allegations brought against Justice Kavanaugh.
— Senate Judiciary Committee Report, 11/2/18
Just what do you think will happen?
The 2018 Midterm Elections
- Republicans retain control of House and Senate (69%, 11 Votes)
- Democrats take control of House, Republicans retain control of Senate (25%, 4 Votes)
- Republicans retain control of House, Democrats take control of Senate (6%, 1 Votes)
- Democrats take control of House and Senate (0%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 16
For the last few political cycles, we’ve been repeatedly told that “this election is the most important in history”. While we may be still a few years away from that apocalyptic bar, here’s really what’s on the ballot in 2018.
Media Run Amok
The First Amendment protects “freedom of the press”. It could be argued that the Founding Fathers would’ve added a little more to that Amendment had they envisioned multi-millionaire news anchors using their access to the American people to steer public opinion instead of informing as a privileged watchdog of government.
In 2016, the votes did not go as the media predicted and they ramped up their efforts to destroy an election result they didn’t authorize.
Should Democrats achieve a modicum of electoral success in 2018, the media’s influence will be validated which will empower them to be even more emboldened. Their clear partisanship and disdain for an American people that dared not vote the way they believe we should will continue as we’ll also be validating what they perceive to be their elitist, intellectual superiority.
Despite What You Hear, It’s NOT in the Bag for Democrats
If you listen to the media and pundits, it’s almost a fait accompli that the Democrats will retake the House and inflict their long-awaited and overdue 2016 presidential vengeance on Donald Trump and his supporters. But when you see the campaign appearances by Barack Obama, Oprah, Jimmy Buffett and others deemed progressive “superstars”, there must be something in their internals that say midterm victories for Democrats is NOT a done deal.
Nearly two years of organizing, marching, candidate recruitment and unprecedented fundraising has led the Democratic party to a critical moment. On Tuesday, it can either reassert itself politically or fall short, prompting an utter and complete psychological meltdown.
“I can’t even contemplate it, it would be so indescribable,” said former Rep. Steve Israel, who chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee until 2014, told The Daily Beast in an interview. “I just don’t see it happening. If it did, in the unlikely event that it did, it would probably count as one of the biggest moral blows to Democrats in recent memory. Second maybe only to our presidential loss in 2016.“
— Daily Beast, 11/5/18
The predictions of doom and gloom mixed with the traditional “What Do Democrats Need to Do to Win?” partisan media lament began two years ago, giving the impression the nation was united in its #resistance to Donald Trump and his agenda.
But it’s also what Democrats are NOT talking about that’s interesting.
Many Democrats remain silent about the caravan approaching the U.S.
Trump Approval Among Black Voters Rises to Record 40 Percent in Rasmussen Poll
Latino voters in Florida could help Republicans win in key races
Target Early, a Democratic political data and data services firm, has bad news for Democrats
The actions of prominent and elected Democrats imply there is something to worry about. Nonprofits have heavily fundraised off the hate of Donald Trump, celebrities have joined the campaign trail to feed off that hate, and reputations are on the line if Democrats don’t pull off that much-predicted victory.
It could also be argued that the economy is the best in decades, if not ever, because of the unconventional approach President Trump has taken. His insights as a businessman runs counter to the tactics used by career politicians (a concept the Founders probably didn’t envision and would have frowned upon) and bureaucrats that never really solve a problem because to do so might endanger the employment and pensions of civil servants whose positions may be rendered no longer needed.
The choice is clear.
During President Trump’s time in office, the economy has achieved feats most experts thought impossible. GDP is growing at a 3 percent-plus rate. The unemployment rate is near a 50-year low. Meanwhile, the stock market has jumped 27 percent amid a surge in corporate profits.
— CNBC, 9/7/18
Should Democrats take control of either House or Senate, their goal will be to impede the Trump economy as to make it an issue in 2020. Officeholders and the media won’t take a hit. They’ll have their jobs and benefits. It’s the American people who will suffer; something they’ve almost always cared little about because the ultimate goal is power.
Democrats, despite their election moderation, WILL attempt to impeach Donald Trump if they take the House of Representatives. The damage to the stock market, thus jobs, could be significant which is exactly what they want. Overturning the 2016 Will of the People will be their goal, as it’s been the day after the president was elected.
#DeepState Given the Green Light
For those of you not in close proximity to the Washington, D.C. area, it’s heavily dependent on the federal government. Liberal Democrats run the area, just like they run the inner workings in and around Capitol Hill.
They believe THEY are entitled to our tax dollars. They’ve created lucrative employment packages for themselves and freeze out those who could do those jobs more effectively and responsibly. They have employee unions that dictate what they’ll be paid, how much they have to work, how much they’ll receive when they retire and who has the right to oversee them. President Trump has put their security in flux and they’ve targeted him with the full force of the federal law enforcement mechanism.
We know federal employees, in particular the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation, preferred Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in 2016. We know they used “long-established norms” to attempt to entrap a presidential candidate, members of his campaign, later his transition team and after, his administration in an attempt to forcibly remove him from his duly elected office.
They brazenly use their power to indict anyone they want associated to Donald Trump, callous to the financial ramifications on those they target. They whine when THEY are caught and lose pensions and/or lucrative security clearances as a result of their partisan acts.
Had Hillary Clinton won the presidency, 90% of what we know about a Russian dossier, dubiously obtained FISA warrants, and other nefarious acts by government employees against a sitting president would’ve been hidden from the American people to this day, and that’s exactly how they wanted it. With the victory of Donald Trump, federal employee shenanigans are being revealed, albeit slowly, and all-important careers and possible prison time is on the table.
If Democrats take the House, investigations of federal employees (who basically staged a bloodless coup) will slow if not be ceased. These employees will also be emboldened to increase their bully tactics against anyone who works in and around the Trump Administration and strengthen their own defense against what they attempted to do. And if they did it once and got away with it, they WILL do it again to President Trump in 2020 and in elections beyond.
Nonprofits and Activists
If Democrats achieve any level of election success, the bullying of Americans will also be validated and will become that “new normal”. We’ll see increased political violence, much of will be encouraged by genuine line items in activist nonprofit budgets.
Get ready for more iterations of #BlackLivesMatter, #WomensMarch, #Antifa and whomever can ramp up as much political disruption as needed.
That is, until Democrats are back in control. Then, any kind of political dissent will be promptly denounced as “unpatriotic”.
Education and Entertainment
For now, a lost cause.
Liberals are churning out little liberals, superseding the values of parents, and creating a voting bloc meant to transform the United States into a socialist utopia never achieved in the human experience. While they won’t teach students of the downside, these new voters are blind to what they wish to create and they’ll talk down to us with authority. A Democrat midterm victory will also validate the irresponsible behavior of teachers and professors, many of whom are paid with taxpayer dollars and via unions, have inoculated themselves from any scrutiny for children they fail to educate in subjects that really matter.
These are just some of the national issues “on the ballot” the media may not be fully informing the American people about. Statewide and local elections will also validate the tactics used by determined Democrats that will be referred-to and used again in campaigns to come.
We get the government we vote for. 2018 will be no different.
As someone who’s spoken in public, I appreciate how easy it is for an audience to throw you off message. Rush Limbaugh was visually impacted by the size and energy of the Trump rally in Cape Girardeau, Missouri the night before the midterm election.
There are things he said the afternoon before the rally that didn’t get an opportunity to be translated in person but he still did a great job!
If you didn’t think the so-called #DeepState isn’t scared shitless about the possibility that President Trump may soon declassify all documents relating to the Russian collusion ruse, remember: only they are allowed to screw people’s lives and even send anyone they want to prison. It’s not supposed to happen to THEM and now that it’s a distinct possibility, they are fighting back to save their arrogant, fat and comfortable asses.
In court filings last week the Department of Justice deployed what could be the nuclear option in its latest effort to prevent President Trump from declassifying information regarding FISA warrants used to spy on his campaign aide Carter Page: It is claiming that such a move would interfere with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
This is the first time the DOJ has explicitly made this argument implying personal peril for the president, since interference could open Trump to charges of obstruction of justice. Until now, the department has argued that declassifying the documents threatened national security.
In the 178-page court document, DOJ officials said they had “determined that disclosure of redacted information in the Carter Page FISA documents could reasonably be expected to interfere with the pending investigation into Russian election interference.”
That rationale has heightened suspicions among congressional investigators that the special counsel is being used to prevent the disclosure of possible FBI abuses and crimes committed during the Russia probe.
“The obstruction trap was built into the special counsel,” a congressional investigator told RCI, speaking, like the two other sources in this article, only on condition of anonymity. “If Trump fires Mueller, or Rosenstein, or declassifies documents [embarrassing to the FBI] it’s likely to bring an obstruction charge.”
And that would mean double jeopardy for Trump. “Obstruction is the instrument the Democrats are likely to use to impeach Trump if they win the House,” said the congressional source.
— Real Clear Investigation, 10/26/18
Now you can understand why the 2018 midterm elections are so important, especially to the left.
A lot of people feel the way you do, Senator, that words matter. Why don’t a group of you all get together and just confront him and say, you know, “Mr. President, this is not helping. You’ve got to stop it”? So many people come on this program and say what you’re saying, “This is wrong, this is bad. What are we going to do?” It’s very tit for tat. But I know there are people that feel, a lot of people that feel the way you do in very powerful positions. Why don’t a group of you just confront him and just say stop it?
— CBS This Morning co-host Gayle King to Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), 10/26/18
It looks like the message has been sent again because President Trump hasn’t gone away, despite earlier warnings.
“They have six ways from Sunday to get back” at the President of the United States… wow.
So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this.
— Senator Chuck Schumer, Rachel Maddow Show, 1/3/17
It’s not about who the people want to represent them but about saving those within the federal government from the peril they created for themselves and a media so willing to collude with them to remove a president they didn’t authorize.
There was a very biased culture when it comes to the investigations of the 2016 Donald J. Trump campaign and so-called “Russian collusion”: political bias within the Federal Bureau of Investigation as well as those conducting the special counsel investigation. It was obviously very embarrassing to the FBI and the director offered the following assurances (in the aftermath of the Inspector General report) to the American people that the agency will make every attempt to conduct further business in a professional, non-biased manner… an assurance one would think never had to be made.
Because change starts at the top—including right here with me—we’re going to begin by requiring all our senior executives, from around the world, to convene for in-depth training on the lessons we should learn from today’s report. Then we’re going to train every single FBI employee—new hires and veterans alike—on what went wrong, so those mistakes will never be repeated.
We’re going to make sure we have the policies, procedures, and training needed for everyone to understand and remember what’s expected of us.
That includes: Drilling home the importance of objectivity—and of avoiding even the appearance of personal conflicts or political bias in our work.
— Christopher Wray, FBI Director, 6/14/18
We’ve heard this all before. A government agency and/or employee runs afoul of the rules and we’re all assured that agency or person receives the appropriate retraining. We decided to inquire as to what kind of in-depth training would be conducted, WHO would be composing the training syllabus and WHO would be presenting the anti-bias training to employees. We thought this a reasonable request seeing how the American people would not only be affected by those “trained” agents but taxpayers would also be paying for the physical materials and paying those who’ll be administering the “training” to FBI personnel around the world.
We sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI and received the following response….
So, the same FBI that had agents sending highly-biased text messages between them (that we only found out about because of an internal investigation) is now telling us their remedies won’t be made public in the interest of “national defense or foreign policy”?
The following is the FBI’s attached reasoning and justification.
We won’t know what the FBI will be teaching their senior executives down through the ranks, on foreign soil and domestically. We won’t know WHO will be doing the teaching of this anti-biased training… any number of our favorite social justice activists, a contractor from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the ACLU, etc.?
The American people will just have to take their word for it… again.
One would’ve thought they federal government takes the issuance of Top Secret or Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) clearances very seriously, yet we’ve seen many recent examples of those who believe they’re political beliefs take precedence over the ramifications of lax security of our nation’s secrets.
While on the USS Midway, I can’t tell you how many times the perils of infidelity was reiterated and why. Improper actions were also emphasized in every division where classified materials were routinely handled as character flaws can leave one susceptible to coercion and possible blackmail.
Even if federal employees with a security clearance are able to keep an extramarital affair from a spouse, they will have a harder time keeping that secret from the government, especially when their clearance comes up for review. Adultery is the kiss of death for federal employees with security clearances; it is very hard to prove to Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) administrative judge that an employee who engaged in adulterous conduct does not pose a threat to national security given the individuals’ susceptibility to coercion related to the affair.
— FedSmith, 1/6/13
Now, add to that someone who has had at least one affair while holding a high level position in law enforcement and the failure to halt his access to top secret materials to this day (probably because no one will risk their career put their own signature on a rejection), and we again appear to have a system that most have to adhere to and a select few where the rules don’t apply.
FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok may have lost his access to Sensitive Compartmented Information materials years ago but that doesn’t seem to make a difference for either him or the mistress.
Two romantically involved FBI officials who were removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s team over a series of anti-Trump text messages still have Top Secret security clearances, Sen. Rand Paul revealed Wednesday.
— Fox News, 4/11/18
Unfortunately but not at all surprising, the Federal Bureau of Investigation looks like another government entity where those near the top can do anything they want because anyone calling them on it risks their career and the all-important post-career benefits all appear to covet above all else.
The very people who can destroy the lives of any American they choose can skirt the rules to their benefit and while it literally took a Joint Congressional hearing to find this particular instance out, those who shouldn’t have access to classified materials still do and no one will do anything about it.
These people have the almost unlimited power and resources of the federal government to issue charges against us, issue warrants against us, kick in our doors at any hour of day or night and force us to drain our bank accounts to defend ourselves and hopefully keep our asses out of jail for as long as they want.
Yet, when they clearly behave in an inappropriate manner in the discharge of their duties and are called on their impropriety and possible prosecutorial biases, we’re to accept their excuses and accept the overused retort that “It is not who I am” when actions show it indeed was….
Deputy Assistant FBI Director Peter Strzok was one of the thousands of comfortable in the federal government who clearly had a pro-Hillary Clinton bias, looked the other way when investigating her yet had no problem destroying the lives of anyone associated with the Donald Trump presidential campaign or his subsequent administration.
We can only imagine the prosecutorial blitzkrieg people like Strzok would have rained down upon anyone who sought to undermine a Hillary Clinton administration utilizing the full power of the Department of Justice. There would be no mercy, let along an opportunity to blow off subpoenas to testify in front of Congressional oversight committees as did Lisa Page, the colleague Strzok was screwing around with. That is, until she was threatened with the possible loss of her pension, assets and maybe even freedom.
It must suck to be looking at the potential destruction of your professional life and personal finances as these career employees have done to countless American citizens, guilty or not, simply because they could and it might achieve a preferred career boost.
“It is not who I am”….
Yes, it was and is.
Some of you have heard the latest when it comes to doing stupid things like making audible jokes at Los Angeles International Airport. But a pattern is informally emerging.
If you’re a professional athlete, don’t do it….
Green Bay Packers wide receiver Trevor Davis was arrested at LAX on Sunday morning after cops say he joked about smuggling a bomb into the airport, TMZ Sports has learned. Law enforcement sources tell us the 24-year-old — a 5th round draft pick out of Cal in 2016 — was at the Hawaiian Airlines ticket counter with a female companion to check into a flight when the attendant asked the usual security questions about their luggage.
Instead of playing it straight — we’re told Davis turned to the other woman and said, “Did you remember to pack the explosives?” She apparently said, “No” and tried to get him to stop. He then said, “Just kidding” — but it was too late.
— TMZ Sports, 4/9/18
And this is not the first time an athlete was arrested for an ill-timed comment at LAX.
San Francisco 49ers linebacker Aldon Smith was arrested Sunday at Los Angeles International Airport after authorities said he became belligerent during a security screening and threatened that he had a bomb.
The 24-year-old player was randomly selected for a secondary screening at Terminal 1 and became uncooperative during the process, airport police Sgt. Karla Ortiz said. She said he told a TSA agent that he had a bomb before walking to the gate. When airport police officers caught up with him, Ortiz said Smith became uncooperative and was taken into custody.
— Hollywood Reporter, 4/14/14
To date, the amount of black Americans attempting or carrying out an explosive attack on an airline is relatively small, if at all. However the same can’t be said about muslims, yet they can apparently make verbal threats at Los Angeles International Airport and only be called on it once those threats become very public.
Muslim Woman Makes Terror Threats at LA Airport
One day after the Islamic terrorist attack in Orlando, a Muslim woman showed up at the Los Angeles International Airport, making terror threats. The news media was silent. Journalist and cameraman Tony Vera captured police questioning a Muslim woman at the airport and searching her luggage, but finding nothing wrong, they released her and let her continue on inside the airport.
Vera stopped her as she walked past him, and that’s when she let lose again, with verbal terrorist threats against America. “Fuck America,” the woman said. “I will make sure we bomb America. You wait and see!” She ranted on for several minutes, and eventually police arrested her again at the ticket counter, this time for real.
According to Dennis Michael Lynch, the woman made comments provocative enough for the LAX police and LAPD call the FBI, all of whom appear to have decided those comments did not warrant an arrest until she took it inside. Certainly the comments of Trevor Davis and Alton Smith were no way in the same league as “Fuck America. I will make sure we bomb America. You wait and see.” One was a bad joke and the other was the retort of a spoiled athlete who though he was better than the travelling public.
So, we’re at a place where a muslim woman can say things that can earn her the attention of local and federal law enforcement, be allowed to walk away and only be arrested when she dares do it again? Trevor Davis and Alton Smith seemed to have received a whole lot less slack than the muslim woman which comes back to what we’ve been saying for years: muslims demand equal treatment.
I have am going to have a safe life but I’m going to make sure none of you will have a safe sleep. Boom! Wait and see for yourself. Do you know who Allah is? Fuck America. I will make sure we bomb America. First of all there is lesbian and gay this is not allowed. Wait and see! We will bomb the country. You have no idea what’s happening. That’s what we do, we bomb people. Who cares what’s right or what’s not, it is (god’s will).”
— UK Sun, 10/21/16
They really demand special treatment and they appear to be getting it.