uncomfortable conservative commentary
Why has the Democrat-media and their left been on the offensive#Resistance against Donald Trump ever since he won the Republican nomination, the presidency and ever since? Yes, it’s because they can’t accept the fact someone they didn’t authorize won the hearts and minds of Americans they failed to dissuade.
Continue reading “‘Russian Collusion’ Provides Cover for a Treasonous FBI-CIA-DOJ Coup D’état”
If one were to accept the dictionary definition, that’s precisely the conclusion one could rightfully come away with.
rape
1 : unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person’s will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception
2 : an outrageous violation
— Merriam Webster
Remove the sexual reference and it’s all about force. Review the uncensored history of the Democrat Party and see when they didn’t get what they wanted politically or socially, they resorted to bullying, persecution and/or downright murderous violence to force their opponents to succumb.
Today, they’ve just changed the color of their hoods.
Fast forward to November 8, 2016 when the presidential election didn’t go the Democrats’ way, they immediately created a #resistance movement because they believed the very legislation liberals imposed on the American people were about to be erased. While Republicans have been repeatedly told to respect the “will of the people” when Democrats were in control of the agenda items, they conveniently forget what we were all told when they could force their will on the American people.
Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won. So I think on that one I trump you.
— President Barack Obama to House Republican Whip Eric Cantor, 1/23/09
With the election result of 2016, Democrats are ironically getting a taste of that “trump” and of course, they can’t accept the results of a vote they didn’t win. They seldom do.
1994: Prop. 187 Approved in California
1999: CA’s Anti-Immigrant Proposition 187 is Voided
2008: California Votes for Prop 8
2012: Prop. 8: Gay-marriage ban unconstitutional, court rules
When the left wins, it’s called the “Will of the People”. When they lose, it was because The People were either uninformed (too stupid) or too narrow-minded (bigoted) to know how they should have voted, thus the results must be challenged and the “Will of the People” be overturned. See how this works and why we are where we’re at today?
— Bob Parks, 3/26/13
Democrats and their operatives have successfully used the courts to undermine the will of the people at the ballot box and now, even that is being threatened with the looming confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Resistance “by any means necessary” is in the Democrat DNA. It doesn’t matter whom they inconvenience and harass. It’s all about getting their way, or else.
We’re gonna punish our enemies, and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.
— President Barack Obama, Univision Radio interview
Again it’s ironic that Kavanaugh would probably have approached his new position with a desire to be fair and nonpartisan, that is until the left unleashed a barrage of partisan attacks on him and his family. A Supreme Court justice Kavanaugh will look at things in a whole new way and that has Democrats doing what they’ve always done: impose themselves on others and intimidate.
The recent marching orders for intimidation officially came from a former United States attorney general as well as a member of Congress.
Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.
— Rep. Maxine Waters, (D-CA)
Almost everything Democrats do involves marketing the politics of fear and division, and when that doesn’t work, they ramp it up to intimidation and cowardly violence; not necessarily in that order. The left will counter that the bipartisan Tea Party was a resistance movement. Yes, it was but the methods were very different and the right has never resorted to random disruption, physical intimidation and violence to achieve their objectives. They even clean up after themselves when they congregate to protest, unlike the left.
Something is going on behind the scenes. The Kavanaugh confirmation is a done deal, despite the smears of desperation.
Why are Democrats going so batshit crazy in the runup to the midterm election? Their media is telling us all that the House flipping to the Democrats is a fait accompli and the Senate could even be in play. If that’s the case, why all the hysterics? Is it really out of panic that women may lose the “choice” to discard inconvenient babies, or could it also be the continued deterioration of their ability to force their will on the American people?
President Trump is removing regulations created and enforced by unelected liberal Democrat bureaucrats because, as President Obama boasted, “elections have consequences”.
All Democrats have left is rape: carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person’s will.
Having a television show is a responsibility; even a show with questionable reach.
TBS’ Samantha Bee had now-shamed former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on her show and did so in a very juvenile, over-the-top fawning and manner.
Bee, in typical liberal modus operandi, reedited the title and description of her YouTube video segment from November 8, 2017 to imply she was a victim of a misrepresentation con and proceeded with the #MeToo pile-on.
No, she found a champion; put all of her eggs in that #antiTrump, #resistance, #MeToo basket, that she set herself up for the humiliation she rightfully deserves.
By editing her title, Bee admits that she was busted in blind, full-frontal praise of Schneiderman and has attempted to cover her tracks because her judgment is in valid question. Then again, an evil man tricked HER: add her to the list of #MeToo.
Had anyone on Fox News or any conservative media outlet produced such a squishy segment with a serial abuser of women, Samantha Bee would be the first to call out that outlet on their stupidity and complicity in propping up such a vile person. But she assumed no responsibility for having on someone who misled her and her audience. She took no responsibility for not properly vetting a guest on her show, even though it was a well-kept secret.
“Fuck you, Eric Schneiderman” is not a respected acknowledgement of a lapse in judgment or even an admission that believing Schneiderman may just mean some of the things he said about Donald Trump may also not be true.
Samantha Bee has no credibility outside of her small mind.
Then again, she has a TV show and that’s all she needs.
Despite of our proper use of her video clips under the Copyright Act of 1976 (for criticism, commentary) and not a blatant attempt just to siphon views and monetize, like so many others on YouTube, our clip was “manually detected” and removed after either Samantha Bee and/or someone at Turner Broadcasting objected to our “resistance”.
We’re now one “strike” away from having our channel deleted and we know Google is digging deep into our archive for that good excuse.
However, it’s kinda gratifying that one black man and his wife are that much of a threat to a liberal “celebrity” elitist and the company that pays her.
Then again, a simple YouTube search shows very little in the way of any kind of dissenting views when it comes to Samantha Bee. Is this because she’s universally agreed-with or does Turner have a raving egomaniac on their hands who demands a “fuck you” to anyone who deems her more of a no-talent joke than the juvenile ones written for her?
Let’s keep this simple.
Barack Obama is no longer president and John Kerry is no longer his Secretary of State, so WHY is he meddling in foreign affairs against the Trump Administration?
Former Secretary of State John Kerry has fielded dozens of private meetings and phone calls in recent months in an effort to preserve the Iran nuclear deal, as President Trump appears poised to withdraw from the pact.
The Boston Globe reported on Friday that Kerry, who helped broker the 2015 nuclear agreement, met with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif at the United Nations in New York last month to discuss ways to salvage the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — the formal name for the Iran deal.
He has also met and spoken with a handful of European officials. Last month, he met with German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, according to the Globe, and spoke by phone with Federica Mogherini, the European Union’s top foreign affairs official. Kerry also reportedly met with French President Emmanuel Macron, both in New York and in Paris.
— The Hill, 5/4/18
This is not an isolated incident when it comes to Kerry’s “shadow diplomacy” disruption.
Former Secretary of State John Kerry recently urged Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas to resist President Donald Trump, telling the PA leader to ‘stay strong’ and ‘play for time’ – while suggesting he may make a second bid for the White House.
— Arutz Sheva, 1/24/18
In keeping it simple, Iran is a formal enemy of the United States and it can be argued that John Kerry has no business engaging in any kind of diplomatic discussions with any nation, especially without the expressed permission and logistical guidance of the State Department.
State Sponsors of Terrorism
Designation under the above-referenced authorities also implicates other sanctions laws that penalize persons and countries engaging in certain trade with state sponsors. Currently there are four countries designated under these authorities: the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea), Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
— U.S. Department of State
President Trump has publicly stated his opposition to the mysterious “Iran nuclear deal” with cash payment and his historically justified mistrust of the Iranian regime. The way it went down still stinks.
The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency, as Republican critics of the transaction continued to denounce the payments. Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also introduced a bill that prohibits cash payments to Iran and demands transparency on future settlements.
“Sending the world’s leading state sponsor of terror pallets of untraceable cash isn’t just terrible policy,” Royce said. “It’s incredibly reckless, and it only puts bigger targets on the backs of Americans. … This cash bonanza has emboldened Iran’s radical regime, and undermined America’s national security.”
— Los Angeles Times, 9/7/16
While the average American is required to return an employee manual upon leaving a place of employment, it’s not clear how many in the Obama administration still have theirs, which can be extremely problematic for obvious political reasons and Kerry’s unauthorized meetings with an enemy regime could be highly illegal; not like that’s a deterrent.
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
— 18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governments
This appears to be yet another prime example of Democrats who still refuse to accept the results of the 2016 presidential election and the political “elections have consequences” ramifications that came with it. While the left still considers the “Iran nuclear deal” a monumental success (simply because it was signed off by Obama), they have no business meddling against the ongoing negotiations of the Trump Administration, IF such negotiations are going on at this time or not.
Kerry has been on an aggressive yet stealthy mission to preserve the agreement, using his deep list of contacts to try to apply pressure on the Trump administration from the outside. President Trump has a May 12 deadline to decide whether to continue abiding by deal’s terms.
— Boston Globe, 5/4/18
The unsanctioned John Kerry intervention is obviously not in line with the Trump State Department and for any other American, this would be an easily prosecutable offense.
BTW — In case you’re wondering what Kerry’s doing for an official day job, he’s on the “Advisory Council” at an L Street, DC nonprofit called “Diplomacy Works” alongside other Obama fan favorites like Wendy R. Sherman, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs and Director of EMILY’S list; Michèle Flournoy, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy; Puneet Talwar, Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, Special Assistant to President Obama and Senior Director for Iran, Iraq, and the Gulf States at the White House National Security Council; Colin H. Kahl, Deputy Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor to the Vice President, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East at the Pentagon; Robert Malley, Special Assistant to the President and White House Coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf Region, Senior Director on the National Security Council Staff, Special Assistant to the President for Arab-Israeli Affairs (Clinton administration); Jon Finer, Chief of Staff and Director of Policy Planning for Secretary of State John Kerry; and Jen Psaki, White House Director of Communications, Spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, White House Deputy Communications Director, White House Deputy Press Secretary.
A nonprofit whose sole mission is to push back on anyone messing with Obama’s Iran deal.
Diplomacy Works provides information and analysis that empowers policymakers and stakeholders to make the case for upholding the JCPOA as a model of effective foreign policy with diplomacy as the tool of first resort reinforced by our unparalleled military capabilities – a policy which keeps America safe and strong at the same time.
— Diplomacy Works
But since when does the rule of law apply to well-connected, senior federal government officials….
How many times have we heard Hillary Clinton and her defenders repeatedly assert she should now be President of the United States because she won the popular vote over Donald Trump. This is why more of her followers should have been somewhat familiar with the rules of football because in that sport, the winner is determined by which team scores more points over the other; not which team piles up more yardage.
The National Football League has made the game’s objective very simple for those who have any doubts as to the possibly antiquated motivations of those who started playing professionally as early as 1892.
The object of the game is to score the most points.
— NFL Beginner’s Guide to Football
If total yardage were an overall determining factor during the 2017 season, the Philadelphia Eagles would not even be eligible to compete in the Super Bowl.
Given their dominance during the regular season through the playoffs, the New England Patriots should have been declared the winner of Super Bowl LII because they won the total yardage tally in a record-breaking effort.
Despite the effort, the Philadelphia Eagles were awarded the Lombardi trophy because they scored more total points than the Patriots and as total points was the initially accepted determining factor on who wins football games, the final score was accepted by both teams and the New England region is not in full #resist mode, contesting the outcome of a Super Bowl and trying to undo the results.
Going into the 2016 presidential election, the Clinton and Trump campaigns understood the established rules that determine who wins the presidency. It was which campaign won the Electoral College (total points) and NOT who received more popular votes (total yardage).
Overview of the Presidential Election Process
During the general election, Americans head to the polls to cast their vote for President. But the tally of those votes—the popular vote—does not determine the winner. Instead, Presidential elections use the Electoral College. To win the election, a candidate must receive a majority of electoral votes.
This was simply explained by liberal Democrats for Democrats in 2008 but it appears it made sense to almost all but one….
The New England Patriots organization and their fans nationwide would be roundly (and justifiably) ridiculed had they taken to the mics during the post-game press conference and whined that they really won the game because they broke the all-time Super Bowl record for total yardage. It would be even more damning to their reputation if they mobilized fans across the country to attempt to #resist the results and question the legitimacy of the Philadelphia Eagles as the duly victorious on the field.
The sanity of Patriots nation would also be questioned, especially if the sports media also went along with the sore-loser narrative, attempted to create a divide between Philadelphia and the rest of the nation, and even repeated an unproven story line that the Patriots cheated because they somehow colluded the Russians in rigging the game.
During the last couple of weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump observed the established rules and campaigned heavily in states needed to win the game. Unlike Hillary who maybe had one or two appearances every day or so, Trump appeared in four to six events per day. At the end of November 8, 2016, Donald Trump scored more points than Hillary, yet her supporters are still trying to make the case they really won because they got more yards.
If shortsighted Democrats manage to get their way and change our election process to the popular vote, both sides know the new rules and the Democrat loses the popular vote, suddenly discovers the wisdom of the Founders and their reasoning for creating the Electoral College process, they’ll demand we go back to that very well thought out system.
That’ll be as logical as the National Football League changing the rules so total points are no longer the determining factor on who wins a game.
To put our present situation in proper perspective, here’s a definition of the sore-loser, #resistance narcissist we have to deal with.
People with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special, and often try to associate with other people they believe are unique or gifted in some way. This association enhances their self-esteem, which is typically quite fragile underneath the surface. Individuals with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) have difficulty tolerating criticism or defeat, and may be left feeling humiliated or empty when they experience an “injury” in the form of criticism or rejection.
— Psychology Today
Couple that with the mental state of too many on the left….
A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong. The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.
— New York Post, 6/9/16
When Hillary Clinton was defeated and the above mentioned did not get their way, the liberal Democrat left took it very personally. They believed, despite the fact in two elections 120,881,827 voted against Barack Obama, the narcissists claimed a mandate to implement anything and everything they wanted and we were all good with it as we didn’t immediately take to the streets in “mostly peaceful” opposition that they would call “obstructionist”, “racist” and “unpatriotic”.
No Republican voter wanted our local law enforcement repeatedly second-guessed by the President of the United States to the point where some were targeted for assassination by liberal crazies who now consider political violence a valuable tool of #resistance, informally blessed by the former attorney general.
The left assumed the next president would continue the legacy of Barack Obama precisely because it was what THEY wanted and Republicans, respectful of the election process, didn’t take to the streets like spoiled children. Instead, Republicans elected politicians they hoped would #resist his policies. So much for that, however….
No Republican voter wanted the federal government to “stimulate” the economy by throwing billions of dollars to the well-connected into technology that still isn’t economically feasible.
No Republican voter wanted IRS employees to be able to politically target people and/or entities that weren’t of the political positions they hold.
No Republican voter wanted our country to be balkanized by race, gender and our institutions of higher learning be dominated by educators who feel free to indoctrinate students into “mostly peaceful” activists with one-sided presentations.
No Republican voter wanted unelected bureaucrats that could implement policies affecting our land and water and when they screw up, are shielded from any accountability despite how much they pollute and negatively affect the livelihoods and health of the public.
No Republican voter wanted the federal elected to implement a health care system they exempted themselves, their staffs and families from and despite ALL the promises to the contrary, took away our choice of doctors and plans via a website the cost a half billion dollars and didn’t work.
No Republican voter wanted our intelligence agencies to have the ability to spy on us, yet that’s a part of the Obama legacy.
Instead, we got a president in Barack Obama that encouraged his supporters to go home and disrupt family holiday gatherings. In fact, during the 2008 campaign he said,
I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face.
When it comes to the crime of being a presidential narcissist, Barack Obama was clearly near the top of the heap, even though it was mostly the conservative media doing the counting.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of policies the leftist #Swamp imposed on the American people and arrogantly assumed would be left in place.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of federal employees who believed they knew better than the American people and would imposed their beliefs on us with the full power of the government behind them.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of policies that left our inner cities in worse shape then when Obama assumed the presidency, despite direct outreaches to black voters promising the contrary, including condescending overtures like the Obamaphone.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of an administration that repeatedly lied directly to our faces on foreign policy disasters that cost the lives of Americans, blaming everything from a YouTube video or a subsequent election loss on Russian collusion without one scintilla of evidence.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of policies that gave favor (via the overused moniker of “hate”) to a religious minority that holds questionable allegiance to our country while some are committing violent atrocities unheard of until their gradual admittance began with little attempt to assimilate to our culture while gradually demanding we adapt to theirs.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of the continued neglect of Veterans Administration including the many shameless lies told by President Obama, his wife, and other Democrat politicians that veteran homelessness is “functionally ended”.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of a political party in bed with a media that fawned all over and protected an administration led by the president one columnist considered “God”; a president who actually said his election “was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal“.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of lax immigration policies that have led to the deaths of countless innocent Americans, not to mention the sanctioned, continued genocide of millions of babies in the womb. While topics like granting benefits to illegal aliens and gay rights consistently lose at the ballot box, liberal judges blow off the Constitution and impose their superior judgments to the detriment of the “non-college educated” consider beneath them.
The election of Donald J. Trump was a repudiation of liberal Hollywood elites who believed they have the power to change public opinion and shame opposition into voting for Democrats and their policies. Many of these “celebrities” still believe the promise to leave the country and deny us of their presence is enough to make us change our minds despite the fact they never leave when we don’t succumb to their threats.
Since the election of President Donald J. Trump, almost every doom-and-gloom scenario painted by the left has been proven false despite the initial declarative hysterics.
The disaster for America and the world has so many aspects that the economic ramifications are way down my list of things to fear. Still, I guess people want an answer: If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.
— Paul Krugman, New York Times, 11/9/16
The stock market has risen to record levels to this day, yet a responsible admission of error will never come from narcissists.
As a result of the election of President Donald J. Trump, some on the left are planning to invoke the 25th Amendment in an attempt to have him removed because in their wisdom and benevolence, they believe he’s a dangerous narcissist in undoing the wonderful legacy of Barack Obama.
They would know.
Like all good liberal big mouths, Linda Sarsour touched on all of the right points as keynote speaker at the Community Service Recognition Luncheon during the 55th Annual Islamic Society of North America Convention in Houston.
She spoke of helping those oppressed in United States; not just Muslims, but blacks and illegal aliens. She also reminded those in attendance that Muslims should NOT assimilate into American society like all others who’ve flourished here.
Sarsour should be reminded that Muslims were never enslaved in this country like black people, in fact historically, Muslims have enslaved their fair share of black people over the centuries.
Some historians assert that as many as 17 million people were sold into slavery on the coast of the Indian Ocean, the Middle East, and North Africa, and approximately 5 million African slaves were bought by Muslim slave traders and taken from Africa across the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara desert between 1500 and 1900.
Under Sharia (Islamic law), children of slaves or prisoners of war could become slaves but only non-Muslims. In theory, slavery in Islamic law does not have a racial or color component, although this has not always been the case in practice.
The Arab slave trade was most active in West Asia, North Africa, and Southeast Africa. In the early 20th century (post World War I), slavery was gradually outlawed and suppressed in Muslim lands, largely due to pressure exerted by Western nations such as Britain and France. Among the last states to abolish slavery were Saudi Arabia and Yemen, which abolished slavery in 1962 under pressure from Britain; Oman in 1970, and Mauritania in 1905, 1981, and again in August 2007. However, slavery claiming the sanction of Islam is documented presently in the predominantly Islamic countries of Chad, Mauritania, Niger, Mali, and Sudan.
— Arab slave trade, History of slavery in the Muslim world
Especially after Hillary Clinton instructed Donald Trump to respect the outcome of the presidential election (before she lost), one could only imagine the state of perpetual outrage Sarsour and many liberals would have had if Republicans organized a #NotMyPresident hissy fit against Hillary and how unpatriotic they would have been portrayed as by the left and their media.
But because Hillary ran a campaign of lazy, entitled arrogance and lost, this gives license to Sarsour and many others the right to take their dissent to the next (borderline seditious) level.
Sarsour told her luncheon audience that Muslims should not “assimilate” into American society. With few exceptions, most are not. They demand special accommodations, demand American traditions that offend and outrage them be neutralized or removed, with that looming cloud of potential violent repercussion hanging over the offenders.
Nowhere in Sarsour’s address does she admit that wherever there’s a mass-Muslim influx, it’s followed by mayhem, rape and terrorist acts precisely because too many are under-educated and are thus unable to take advantage of the opportunities in those host nations. Way too many don’t feel any responsibility to learn the language or skills necessary to succeed in their new home and when that lack of success leads to frustration or worse, they justify terrorist acts because their host nations haven’t assimilated to them, thus it’s understandable that they beat, rape, shoot, slash, drive through/over and bomb.
And of course, you get called Islamophobe if you point this out when they go off.
It’s hard to name another group that has such a legacy within weeks of their entering a country, yet it’s Donald Trump’s “Islamophobia” because he dared say what no other Republican presidential candidate would. The fact that he won showed Sarsour that the American people have had enough World Trade Centers, Fort Hoods, Pulse nightclubs, Boston Marathons, San Bernardinos, and the many other Muslim attacks perpetrated in the name of an intolerant ideology that we’re to be shamed into embracing because SHE says so.
She’s in the D.C. area this weekend leading another march, this time against the NRA. It’s either been sweltering heat or they’ve been down-poured on big time.
We wonder which God is watching over her?
BTW — The former Clinton administration back in 1995 had some suggestions when it came to assimilation and the responsibilities of those we allow into our country. Barbara Jordan probably wouldn’t care much for Linda Sarsour.
Today is President Trump’s birthday. Any coincidence to screw up this day?
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana was shot Wednesday at a congressional baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia, officials said. His wounds were not believed to be life-threatening. Alexandria police said a suspect in the shooting was in custody.
CBS News has learned that Scalise was shot in the hip. At least three others were also shot, including the gunman and two Capitol Police officers. President Trump said on Twitter that Scalise “was badly injured but will fully recover.”
— CBS News, 6/14/17
The media is going on and on about how prayers should be issued for the Congressmen, their staffers, the security detail, how unfortunate the political discourse is and how sad a day in America this is.
The man was wearing running clothes, asked Duncan: “Are those Republicans or Democrats out there practicing?” Per source familiar.
— CNN Tweet, 6/14/17
This morning’s shooting was predictable, it’s all on the #resistance climate elected Democrats created and I wouldn’t be surprised just how many liberal activists are happy this happened, laments that the shooter was a bad shot, and are hoping for greater accuracy in the future.
Approximately a year ago, the Democrats rigged their primary election so Bernie Sanders would be pushed aside in favor of Hillary Clinton. That made many Democrats very angry, and as has become the pattern going back to their violent infiltration of Trump rallies up to the incident in Portland, this morning’s shooter is a Bernie supporter.
Washington Post Shooter identified by law enforcement officials as James T. Hodgkinson
Heavy Hodgkinson Is a Supporter of Bernie Sanders & Democratic Socialism Who Wrote on Facebook, ‘Trump is a Traitor. Trump Has Destroyed Our Democracy. It’s Time to Destroy Trump & Co.’
We’re going to be instructed by Democrats and their media not to lump all (“it’s on both sides”) with 
that tendency towards documented violence; violence they readily justify.
Not this time….
Last November, after months of being assured by a constant partisan news/entertainment collective onslaught that Hillary would win the presidency, why she didn’t really lose, all the excuses why she did, all that “Russian collusion”, killing people by not saving the intentionally-flawed Obamacare, the now-antiquated Electoral College, Donald Trump’s tax returns, and all that made many Democrats very angry.
One of my favorite TV shows is “The Rachel Maddow Show” on MSNBC.
— Hodgkinson letter, 7/29/12
In a very secretive meeting, George Soros rounded up high-ranking Democrats and met in a D.C. hotel for a conference on how to #Resist President Trump and his agenda; an agenda millions of Americans voted for which made many Democrats very angry.
George Soros and other rich liberals who spent tens of millions of dollars trying to elect Hillary Clinton are gathering in Washington for a three-day, closed door meeting to retool the big-money left to fight back against Donald Trump.
The conference, which kicked off Sunday night at Washington’s pricey Mandarin Oriental hotel, is sponsored by the influential Democracy Alliance donor club, and will include appearances by leaders of most leading unions and liberal groups, as well as darlings of the left such as House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairman Keith Ellison, according to an agenda and other documents obtained by POLITICO.
— Politico, 11/14/17
Entrenched federal employees went underground and actively planned to #resist the president’s (thus the American people’s) agenda, formed a nationwide network called #Indivisible which succeeded in turning out thousands of Democrats to go to Republican House and Senate members’ town hall meetings and disrupt them because they didn’t like Republican proposals that made many Democrats very angry. Yes, the Tea Party did the same thing but there was no expectation of possible violence like there is today whenever the left gathers en masse.
As former but prominent “leaders” of the party, neither Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, nor Bernie Sanders told their black-masked mobs committing acts of vandalism, stopping traffic, and violently attacking Trump supporters in the streets to stop. The Democrats lost the presidential election and every special election since and that made many Democrats very angry.
President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country. In his final official speech as President, he spoke about the important role of citizen and how all Americans have a responsibility to be the guardians of our democracy — not just during an election but every day.
Citizens exercising their Constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by their elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake.
With regard to comparisons to President Obama’s foreign policy decisions, as we’ve heard before, the President fundamentally disagrees with the notion of discriminating against individuals because of their faith or religion.
— Former president Barack Obama, statement, 1/20/17
When Barack Obama won his presidential elections, the left took to the streets in a Third World-like frenzy. No Republicans got in their face in street opposition to rain on their parade. Democrats had their victory, the media echoed their joy, and they were allowed to enjoy their day if not openly gloat.
Republicans were not allowed to enjoy their election victory.
From the moment Donald Trump was declared President of the United States, there has been nothing but a constant onslaught of Democrat and their media’s talking points about “Russian collusion”, “obstruction of justice”, “impeachment”, and anything they can say or do to delegitimize the Republican victory and we wonder why it’s come to a shooting aimed directly at Republicans and these same Democrats and their media are now telling us all to take a step back and check the partisan air?
Fuck that.
A couple of days ago, I told Laura that I saw this getting violent. I predicted that there could be a violent clash between Democrats and Republicans because the left believes they can do anything they want to reach that “by any means necessary” goal: impeach and replace Donald Trump with a Democrat, then go after Vice President Pence and so damage the Republican brand that even Hillary could win in 2020.
Until then, ramp it up.
Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe was one of the first to officially politicize the shooting, saying “93 million” people are killed in the United States every year by guns. This is the same Terry McAuliffe who still shamelessly and falsely declares, to this day, Virginia the “first state to functionally end veteran homelessness”.
Like cowardly college professors who propagandize their captive students and incite them to take to the streets (while they stay safely behind in their campus-provided housing), Democrat politicians on Capitol Hill have been actively inciting their base to do anything to destroy the duly-elected President Trump, his family, his cabinet, and his support base.
Today’s shooting is a natural progression of all they’ve done since November 9, 2016 and no one with any credibility should let the Democrats off the hook. When they repeatedly told us “elections have consequences” after they won, we now know exactly what that means when they lose.
